What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment and declined to reverse or modify it.

Who is affected by this decision?

The decision affects appellant Donovan Tyler Adkins and the State of Florida in the underlying criminal case.

Why is there no explanation of the court's reasoning?

The court issued a short per curiam affirmance without a published opinion, so no detailed reasoning is included in this document.

Can this decision be further appealed?

Potential further review (such as a motion for rehearing or petition to a higher court) may be possible; deadlines and eligibility depend on Florida appellate rules.

Donovan Tyler Adkins v. State of Florida

Docket 5D2024-2803

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 16, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 5D2024-2803

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County (criminal matter)

Summary

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in the criminal case of Donovan Tyler Adkins. The appeal arose from a conviction or post-conviction ruling in Brevard County Circuit Court, and the appellate panel issued a brief per curiam decision on April 16, 2026, concluding the lower court's decision should stand. No additional opinion or written reasoning was published in this document; the court simply announced affirmance and noted concurrence by the three judges.

Issue Decided

Whether the trial court's judgment or ruling in the underlying criminal case should be reversed on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying published opinion, indicating the appellate panel found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings or judgment. Because the opinion contains no extended analysis, the decision rests on the court's determination that the record supported the lower court's ruling. Concurrence by the three judges indicates unanimous agreement to affirm.

Parties

Appellant: Donovan Tyler Adkins
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Kathryn M. Speicher
Attorney: Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender
Attorney: Victoria R. Cordero, Assistant Public Defender
Attorney: James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Attorney: Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General

Key Dates

Appellate decision date: 2026-04-16

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel about rehearing or further appeal
If the appellant believes there are grounds for further review, consult counsel promptly about filing a motion for rehearing or seeking discretionary review, noting the time limits under Florida appellate rules.
2
Request mandate or issuance of mandate-related documents
Coordinate with counsel to obtain formal mandate or disposition documents from the appellate clerk to confirm the case status and any required compliance.
3
Review trial record for preservation of issues
Have counsel review the trial and appellate records to determine whether any preserved issues might support relief in a higher court or collateral proceedings.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment and declined to reverse or modify it.
Who is affected by this decision?: The decision affects appellant Donovan Tyler Adkins and the State of Florida in the underlying criminal case.
Why is there no explanation of the court's reasoning?: The court issued a short per curiam affirmance without a published opinion, so no detailed reasoning is included in this document.
Can this decision be further appealed?: Potential further review (such as a motion for rehearing or petition to a higher court) may be possible; deadlines and eligibility depend on Florida appellate rules.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                      Case No. 5D2024-2803
                 LT Case No. 05-2023-CF-015238-A
                  _____________________________

DONOVAN TYLER ADKINS,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                  _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.
Kathryn M. Speicher, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria R. Cordero,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R.
Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.

                         April 16, 2026


PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.


MAKAR, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
          _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
           _____________________________




                       2