Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Drakar Lamar Smith v. State of Florida

Docket 3D2024-1467

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
3D2024-1467

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a criminal matter

Summary

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in a criminal appeal brought by Drakar Lamar Smith against the State of Florida. The opinion, filed April 29, 2026, is per curiam and brief: the court announced its disposition as "Affirmed" without published reasoning in this short opinion. The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the circuit court's judgment should be reversed (criminal appeal by defendant Drakar Lamar Smith)

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is per curiam and does not include substantive reasoning in this brief entry; the court simply announced that it affirmed the lower court's judgment. No legal analysis or factual explanation is provided in the text of this opinion.

Parties

Appellant
Drakar Lamar Smith
Appellee
State of Florida
Judge
Cristina Miranda
Attorney
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender
Attorney
Maria Lauredo, Assistant Public Defender
Attorney
James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Attorney
Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General

Key Dates

Opinion filed
2026-04-29

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion for rehearing

    A timely motion for rehearing may be filed to seek reconsideration; the opinion indicates the decision is not final until such motions are resolved.

  2. 2

    Consult appellate counsel

    Defense counsel should review the record and advise whether grounds exist for rehearing or further review in a higher court.

  3. 3

    Prepare for mandate or further proceedings

    If no rehearing is timely filed or rehearing is denied, counsel should prepare for issuance of the mandate and any consequent next steps in the underlying criminal case.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision.
Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?
No. The opinion is a short per curiam entry and does not include substantive reasoning or analysis.
Is this decision final?
Not yet—it's not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Who is affected by this ruling?
The decision affects the appellant, Drakar Lamar Smith, and the State of Florida in the underlying criminal case.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed April 29, 2026.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D24-1467
                      Lower Tribunal No. F23-20103
                          ________________


                         Drakar Lamar Smith,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                            State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.



     An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina
Miranda, Judge.

      Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Maria Lauredo, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.

    James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.


Before SCALES, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.