What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in the criminal case and denied the relief the appellant sought.

Who is affected by this decision?

The appellant, Eric Alexander Roe, and the State of Florida are directly affected; the trial court's conviction or sentence remains in place as to Roe.

Why did the court affirm without an opinion?

The court issued a per curiam affirmance, which means the panel concluded the appeal did not present reversible error but chose not to publish a detailed opinion explaining its analysis.

Can this decision be appealed further?

Possibly; the appellant may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, typically by filing a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction, subject to the state's appellate rules and deadlines.

Eric Alexander Roe v. State of Florida

Docket 6D2024-2814

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 28, 2026 · 3 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2024-2814

Appeal from a criminal judgment in the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in a criminal case. Eric Alexander Roe appealed a Polk County conviction (lower tribunal 2021-CF-005791). The appellate court issued a short per curiam decision on April 28, 2026, concluding the trial court's rulings should stand. No extended opinion or detailed reasoning was published; the panel issued a simple affirmance with all three judges concurring.

Issue Decided

Whether errors asserted by the appellant in the criminal conviction required reversal or other relief on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying written opinion; therefore it implicitly found that the appellant's arguments did not warrant reversal. Because no specific legal analysis was published, the affirmance indicates the panel concluded the trial court's proceedings and rulings were legally sufficient and free of reversible error.

Parties

Appellant: Eric Alexander Roe
Appellee: State of Florida
Attorney: Zachary Chaney
Attorney: James Uthmeier
Attorney: Clara V. Murga
Judge: Traver, C.J.
Judge: Kamoutsas, J.
Judge: Pratt, J.

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-28

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider motion for rehearing
File a motion for rehearing in the Sixth District within the applicable deadline if there are grounds to argue the court overlooked controlling points of law or facts.
2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
Discuss with counsel whether to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court and whether the case raises a significant legal issue that warrants further appeal.
3
Prepare for post-affirmance actions
If the conviction and sentence are final, coordinate with counsel on sentencing, collateral relief options, or other post-conviction remedies such as a motion for postconviction relief, as appropriate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in the criminal case and denied the relief the appellant sought.
Who is affected by this decision?: The appellant, Eric Alexander Roe, and the State of Florida are directly affected; the trial court's conviction or sentence remains in place as to Roe.
Why did the court affirm without an opinion?: The court issued a per curiam affirmance, which means the panel concluded the appeal did not present reversible error but chose not to publish a detailed opinion explaining its analysis.
Can this decision be appealed further?: Possibly; the appellant may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, typically by filing a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction, subject to the state's appellate rules and deadlines.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                       STATE OF FLORIDA
                      _____________________________

                           Case No. 6D2024-2814
                     Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CF-005791
                      _____________________________

                            ERIC ALEXANDER ROE,

                                  Appellant,

                                      v.

                              STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.

                      _____________________________

                 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.
    Catherine L. Combee, Michael P. McDaniel, and Susan L. Barber, Judges.

                                April 28, 2026

PER CURIAM.

      AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and KAMOUTSAS and PRATT, JJ., concur.


Zachary Chaney, of Smith & Eulo Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Clara V. Murga, Assistant
Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
          AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED