What did the appeals court decide?

The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error and left the trial court's ruling in place.

Who is affected by this decision?

The decision affects appellant Shawn Faulk and the State of Florida; it upholds the outcome decided by the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

The decision is final unless a timely motion for rehearing or clarification is filed under Florida appellate rules; if rehearing is denied, further review (such as a petition to the state supreme court) may be possible subject to procedural rules.

Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?

No—the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a published opinion explaining its reasoning.

Faulk v. State of Florida

Docket 1D2024-3124

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 20, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 1D2024-3124

Appeal from a criminal judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in the criminal case of Shawn Faulk. The appeal arose from a decision by the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, and the appellate court, in a per curiam opinion, concluded there was no reversible error and left the lower court's ruling in place. No separate written opinion explaining the court's reasoning was published; the court simply issued an affirmance with three judges concurring and noted that the decision is not final until any timely rehearing motions are resolved.

Issue Decided

Whether the trial court's decision contained reversible error warranting reversal on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance, indicating the panel found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings or rulings. Because no opinion was published, the court did not provide detailed legal analysis; the concurrence of the three judges signals agreement that the record does not support reversal. The absence of a written explanation suggests the court determined the appeal lacked merit under applicable standards.

Parties

Appellant: Shawn Faulk
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: John J. Gontarek
Attorney: Jessica J. Yeary
Attorney: Joel D. Arnold
Attorney: James Uthmeier

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-20

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing rehearing motions
If counsel believes there was a procedural mistake or overlooked point of law, file a timely motion for rehearing or clarification under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
2
Evaluate further appellate options
If rehearing is denied, consult counsel promptly about whether to seek discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and ensure any petition is filed within the applicable deadline.
3
Prepare for post-affirmance consequences
If the conviction and sentence are now affirmed, discuss with counsel steps for sentencing execution, potential motions for relief, or collateral review as appropriate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error and left the trial court's ruling in place.
Who is affected by this decision?: The decision affects appellant Shawn Faulk and the State of Florida; it upholds the outcome decided by the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.
What happens next?: The decision is final unless a timely motion for rehearing or clarification is filed under Florida appellate rules; if rehearing is denied, further review (such as a petition to the state supreme court) may be possible subject to procedural rules.
Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?: No—the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a published opinion explaining its reasoning.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2024-3124
                 _____________________________

SHAWN FAULK,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.
John J. Gontarek, Judge.


                        April 20, 2026

PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel D. Arnold, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.




                               2