Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Felex Joseph v. State of Florida

Docket 4D2025-1595

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
4D2025-1595

Appeal from a criminal conviction/decision of the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County (case no. 502023CF010956AXXXMB).

Summary

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal reviewed Felex Joseph's appeal from a Palm Beach County circuit court criminal case. The appellate court issued a short, per curiam decision affirming the lower court's judgment. No published opinion or detailed reasoning is provided in the document; the court simply notes the judgment is affirmed and that the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the circuit court's judgment in Felex Joseph's criminal case should be reversed on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without published explanation, indicating the panel found no reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings or judgment. Because no opinion is provided, the specific legal analysis and factual application relied on to uphold the judgment are not stated in this document. The procedural note preserves the opportunity for rehearing prior to finality.

Parties

Appellant
Felex Joseph
Appellee
State of Florida
Attorney
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender
Attorney
Ian Eric Seldin, Assistant Public Defender
Attorney
James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Attorney
Lindsay Ayn Warner, Senior Assistant Attorney General
Judge
Cymonie S. Rowe

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-04-23

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion for rehearing

    If the appellant believes there are grounds, they should file a timely motion for rehearing in the district court to ask the panel to reconsider before the decision becomes final.

  2. 2

    Consult appellate counsel about further review

    If rehearing is denied or not filed, the appellant should consult counsel promptly about whether to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court and prepare any necessary filings within the deadline.

  3. 3

    Prepare for implementation of affirmed judgment

    If no further review is pursued or after finality, the parties should take steps required by the affirmed circuit-court judgment (for example, sentencing, incarceration, or other court-ordered actions).

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?
The appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it rejected the appellant's challenge to the circuit court's decision.
Does this decision take effect immediately?
Not yet; the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Who is affected by this ruling?
The primary parties affected are appellant Felex Joseph and the State of Florida, as the lower-court criminal judgment is upheld.
Can this be appealed further?
Potential further review may be available by seeking rehearing in the district court or discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable rules and timeliness.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                               FELEX JOSEPH,
                                  Appellant,

                                      v.

                         STATE OF FLORIDA,
                              Appellee.

                            No. 4D2025-1595

                               [April 23, 2026]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No.
502023CF010956AXXXMB.

   Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Ian Eric Seldin, Assistant Public
Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

  James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay Ayn
Warner, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.

                           *          *           *

   Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.