Fleming v. State of Florida
Docket 1D2025-1274
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 1D2025-1274
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal reviewed Patrick Fleming's appeal from a Leon County circuit court decision. The appellate court, in a brief per curiam opinion, affirmed the lower court's judgment. No published opinion or extended reasoning appears in the record; the panel of three judges concurred and noted that the decision is not final until any timely authorized post-judgment motions are resolved. Fleming proceeded pro se on appeal, and the Attorney General represented the State.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment against Patrick Fleming should be reversed on appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam opinion simply stating the judgment is affirmed without elaboration, indicating the panel found no reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings or ruling. Because no further explanation was provided, the affirmation rests on the court's determination that the record supported the lower court's decision. The opinion notes the judgment is not final until any timely authorized motions under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure are resolved.
Parties
- Appellant
- Patrick Fleming
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- James Lee Marsh
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-16
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider post-judgment motions
If Fleming believes there are grounds, he may timely file authorized motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 to seek rehearing or clarification.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel
Fleming should consult an attorney experienced in appeals to evaluate potential grounds for rehearing or further review and to ensure any filings meet procedural requirements.
- 3
Prepare for mandate and enforcement
If no timely authorized motion is filed or such motions are denied, parties should prepare for the appellate mandate to issue and for the lower court's judgment to be carried out.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error that would require changing the lower court's decision.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- Patrick Fleming (the appellant) and the State of Florida (the appellee) are directly affected; the circuit court's judgment against Fleming remains in place unless altered by further authorized motions.
- Can this decision be changed?
- The decision is subject to change only if Fleming files a timely and authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331; otherwise, the mandate will issue and the judgment will stand.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-1274
_____________________________
PATRICK FLEMING,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
James Lee Marsh, Judge.
April 16, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Patrick Fleming, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.