Glenton Sylvester Hicks v. State of Florida
Docket 4D2025-1035
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-1035
Appeal from the circuit court in a criminal case (L.T. Case No. 502024CF005657AXXXMB) in Palm Beach County.
Summary
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in the criminal case of Glenton Sylvester Hicks against the State of Florida. The opinion is per curiam, brief, and provides no extended reasoning in the published text. The panel unanimously affirmed the lower court's disposition and noted the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment or conviction should be reversed on appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the lower court. No detailed reasoning, legal analysis, or factual findings are provided in the published disposition, so the affirmation stands without an explained basis in this opinion.
Parties
- Appellant
- Glenton Sylvester Hicks
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Scott Ira Suskauer
- Attorney
- Daniel Eisinger
- Attorney
- Robert Gerald Porter
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
- Attorney
- Mary Elizabeth Johnson
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-16
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
A timely motion for rehearing can be filed in the district court to request reconsideration; note the opinion explicitly states the decision is not final until such motions are resolved.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If rehearing is denied, discuss with counsel whether to seek discretionary review from the Florida Supreme Court and evaluate grounds and chances for further appeal.
- 3
Prepare to comply with trial-court judgment
Unless rehearing or further review alters the outcome, the appellant should be prepared to comply with any sentence or obligations imposed by the trial court.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling in the criminal case; the opinion is per curiam and contains no extended explanation.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The primary parties affected are the appellant, Glenton Sylvester Hicks, and the State of Florida; the trial court's judgment remains in place unless a rehearing is granted or further appeal succeeds.
- What happens next?
- The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; after that, Hicks may pursue further review in a higher court if allowed.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Possibly. After resolution of any rehearing motion, the appellant may seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to that court's rules and jurisdiction.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
GLENTON SYLVESTER HICKS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1035
[April 16, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Scott Ira Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case No.
502024CF005657AXXXMB.
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Robert Gerald Porter, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Elizabeth
Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KLINGENSMITH, SHAW and LOTT, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.