Harrell v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2026-0260
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2026-0260
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County
Summary
The appellate court reviewed a pro se appeal by Jesse Cleveland Harrell from a DeSoto County circuit court criminal proceeding under the Florida rules for collateral review. The Second District issued a short per curiam disposition and affirmed the lower court’s decision without published opinion. The court provided no extended reasoning in the order and the panel concurred. The mandate affirms the circuit court’s judgment or order as challenged by Harrell, leaving the trial-court outcome intact.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's ruling in Harrell's criminal matter should be reversed on appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying written opinion, indicating it found no reversible error in the circuit court's decision. Because the panel provided no substantive analysis in this order, the affirmation rests on the conclusion that the lower court's judgment or disposition was legally correct and did not merit reversal. The lack of published reasoning means no novel legal rule was announced.
Parties
- Appellant
- Jesse Cleveland Harrell
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Don T. Hall
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-22
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
If Harrell wishes to seek further review, he should consult an attorney experienced in postconviction and appellate practice to evaluate grounds for a petition to the Florida Supreme Court.
- 2
Consider filing a timely petition
Determine whether to file a petition for discretionary review or other appropriate post-appeal filings, and ensure any petition meets the Florida Supreme Court's filing deadlines and standards.
- 3
Confirm mandate and compliance
Verify the appellate mandate's issuance and comply with any court-ordered obligations remaining from the circuit court's judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error and left the lower-court outcome in place.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The decision directly affects Jesse Cleveland Harrell and the State of Florida regarding the underlying criminal matter from DeSoto County.
- Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?
- No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a written opinion, so it provided no detailed explanation for its ruling.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- Potential further review may be sought by filing a petition with the Florida Supreme Court, subject to that court's jurisdiction and discretionary review rules.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
JESSE CLEVELAND HARRELL,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2026-0260
April 22, 2026
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
DeSoto County; Don T. Hall.
Jesse Cleveland Harrell, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SLEET, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.