What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the lower court’s decision; the panel issued a per curiam opinion with no published explanation.

Who does this decision affect?

It primarily affects Jamal T. Jackson and the State of Florida as parties to the underlying criminal matter.

What happens next after this affirmance?

The decision becomes final after the time to file a motion for rehearing expires and any timely rehearing is resolved; if a rehearing is not filed or is denied, the lower-court judgment stands.

Can this decision be appealed further?

Potential further review may be sought to the Florida Supreme Court, typically by filing a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction or other appropriate petition, subject to the court’s jurisdictional rules.

Jamal T. Jackson v. State of Florida

Docket 6D2025-2035

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 21, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2025-2035

Appeal from the circuit court for Orange County under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal reviewed Jamal T. Jackson’s appeal from the circuit court in Orange County and affirmed the lower court’s decision. The opinion is per curiam, brief, and provides no published reasoning beyond affirmance. The appeal was taken pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and the panel affirmed the judgment below. The court noted the usual rehearing period and that the decision is not final until that period expires and any timely rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court’s ruling (from which Jackson appealed) should be reversed or otherwise disturbed on appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance and did not provide substantive reasoning in the opinion. By affirming, the appellate panel concluded that the lower court’s judgment or order was legally correct or that no reversible error was demonstrated in the appeal briefing. The lack of an opinion indicates the panel found no basis to disturb the circuit court’s decision.

Parties

Appellant: Jamal T. Jackson
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Barbara J. Leach
Attorney: James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Attorney: Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-21

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there was an error, a timely motion for rehearing should be prepared and filed within the appellate rules’ deadline to preserve any further challenge.
2
Evaluate seeking further review
If rehearing is denied or not filed, consult counsel about whether to seek review by the Florida Supreme Court and determine whether jurisdictional grounds exist.
3
Comply with lower-court judgment
If no further review is pursued or allowed, take steps to comply with the circuit court’s judgment or sentencing as applicable.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the lower court’s decision; the panel issued a per curiam opinion with no published explanation.
Who does this decision affect?: It primarily affects Jamal T. Jackson and the State of Florida as parties to the underlying criminal matter.
What happens next after this affirmance?: The decision becomes final after the time to file a motion for rehearing expires and any timely rehearing is resolved; if a rehearing is not filed or is denied, the lower-court judgment stands.
Can this decision be appealed further?: Potential further review may be sought to the Florida Supreme Court, typically by filing a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction or other appropriate petition, subject to the court’s jurisdictional rules.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                           STATE OF FLORIDA
                          _____________________________

                               Case No. 6D2025-2035
                       Lower Tribunal No. 2012-CF-008312-D-O
                         _____________________________

                                  JAMAL T. JACKSON,

                                       Appellant,
                                            v.

                                  STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                       Appellee.
                          _____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Orange County.
                                Barbara J. Leach, Judge.

                                     April 21, 2026

   PER CURIAM.

         AFFIRMED.

   TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and GANNAM, JJ., concur.


   Jamal T. Jackson, Wewahitchka, pro se.

   James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr.,
   Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


     NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
              AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED