Jason Daniel Aycox v. State of Florida
Docket 6D2024-0628
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 6D2024-0628
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County (postconviction/collateral relief matter).
Summary
The Sixth District Court of Appeal reviewed Jason Daniel Aycox's appeal from the Lee County circuit court under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). After considering the record, the court issued a brief per curiam decision affirming the lower court's ruling. No separate opinion or extended reasoning was provided; the panel of judges concurred and the opinion notes the decision is not final until the rehearing period expires.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's ruling in the underlying criminal/postconviction proceedings should be reversed.
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is per curiam and provides no elaborated reasoning in the published text; the court affirmed the lower court's decision after reviewing the appeal under the applicable appellate rule. Because no written explanation was included, the decision stands on the record and the lower court's ruling is upheld.
Parties
- Appellant
- Jason Daniel Aycox
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Bruce Kyle
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier, Attorney General
- Attorney
- David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-28
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, file a motion for rehearing in the appellate court within the rehearing deadline; the decision notes it is not final until that period expires.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel
Because the appellant is pro se, he should consult an attorney to evaluate grounds for rehearing or further review and to confirm deadlines and procedures.
- 3
Assess further review options
If rehearing is denied or not filed, consider whether discretionary review (e.g., seeking review in the Florida Supreme Court) is appropriate and timely.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's ruling — it rejected the appellant's challenge and left the lower-court decision in place.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The decision directly affects Jason Daniel Aycox and the State of Florida in the underlying criminal/postconviction matters.
- Why didn't the court explain its reasoning?
- The court issued a short per curiam opinion that affirms without a written opinion; such summary dispositions are permitted when the panel deems additional explanation unnecessary.
- Is this decision final?
- The decision is not final until the time to file a motion for rehearing expires, and any timely rehearing could affect finality.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-0628
Lower Tribunal Nos. 22-CF-014749, 22-CF-014701, and 23-CF-014435
_____________________________
JASON DANIEL AYCOX,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County.
Bruce Kyle, Judge.
April 28, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
NARDELLA, WHITE and SMITH, JJ., concur.
Jason Daniel Aycox, Doral, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant
Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED