Johnson v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2026-0206
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2026-0206
Appeal from a criminal judgment and sentence in the Circuit Court for Pinellas County under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).
Summary
The Second District Court of Appeal reviewed a criminal appeal by Darryl Johnson from a Pinellas County circuit court under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The panel issued a short, per curiam decision affirming the lower court's judgment. No opinion elaborating reasoning or issues was published; the decision notes concurrence by three judges and that the opinion may be revised before official publication.
Issue Decided
- Whether errors claimed by the appellant warranted reversal of the circuit court's criminal judgment or sentence under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam order affirming the lower court, indicating the panel found no reversible error in the matters presented. Because the opinion contains no published reasoning, the affirmance stands without an extended written explanation of how legal standards applied to the record. The concurrence of the three judges signals unanimous agreement to affirm.
Parties
- Appellant
- Darryl Johnson
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Philip J. Federico
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-22
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
The appellant should consult counsel to evaluate grounds and deadlines for seeking further review, such as a discretionary petition to the Florida Supreme Court.
- 2
Check for mandate and sentencing enforcement
Confirm issuance of the appellate mandate and ensure compliance with any sentence or postconviction deadlines affected by the affirmance.
- 3
Consider postconviction options
If applicable, explore collateral relief options (for example, a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850) with counsel, keeping in mind statutory time limits.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's criminal judgment and sentence; the short per curiam decision did not provide a written opinion explaining the reasons.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The decision directly affects appellant Darryl Johnson and the State of Florida, and it leaves the circuit court's judgment in place.
- Does this decision explain the court's reasoning?
- No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without published reasoning, so the opinion does not detail how legal standards were applied.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- Possibly; depending on the nature of the case and preservation of issues, the appellant may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to jurisdictional rules and filing deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
DARRYL JOHNSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2026-0206
April 22, 2026
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.