Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Jose D. Alcazar v. State of Florida

Docket 3D2026-0199

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
3D2026-0199

Appeal from a circuit court criminal matter under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Summary

The Third District Court of Appeal reviewed a criminal appeal by Jose D. Alcazar from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County under Florida appellate rules. The panel, in a brief per curiam decision, affirmed the lower court's judgment. No opinion explaining the court's reasoning or the issues decided was published; the decision was entered on April 29, 2026, subject to any timely motion for rehearing.

Parties

Appellant
Jose D. Alcazar
Appellee
State of Florida
Judge
Marisa Tinkler Mendez
Attorney
James Uthmeier

Key Dates

Opinion filed
2026-04-29

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider timely motion for rehearing

    Either party may file a motion for rehearing within the time allowed by Florida appellate rules to seek reconsideration before the district court.

  2. 2

    Evaluate petition for discretionary review

    If rehearing is denied or not filed, the appellant should consult counsel about seeking review in the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.

  3. 3

    Confirm finality and compliance

    If no further review is pursued, parties should confirm the judgment's finality and take any necessary steps to comply with or enforce the affirmed judgment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?
The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the circuit court's ruling.
Does this decision take effect immediately?
The opinion is not final until disposition of any timely motion for rehearing; if no rehearing is filed or if it is denied, the affirmance becomes final.
Who is affected by this ruling?
The primary parties affected are the appellant, Jose D. Alcazar, and the State of Florida; the decision upholds the circuit court's outcome in that criminal matter.
Can this be appealed further?
Potential further review depends on whether a timely rehearing is filed and whether the defendant seeks discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court; statutory deadlines and jurisdictional standards apply.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed April 29, 2026.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D26-0199
                       Lower Tribunal No. F22-6632
                          ________________


                            Jose D. Alcazar,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                            State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.



      An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

     Jose D. Alcazar, in proper person.

     James Uthmeier, Attorney General, for appellee.


Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.