What did the appeals court decide?

The court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error that would change the result below.

Does this decision take effect immediately?

The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; if no rehearing is filed or it is denied, the affirmation becomes final.

Who is affected by this ruling?

The appellant, Juan Camilo Hurtado Castano, is directly affected because the trial court's outcome in his criminal case remains in place.

Juan Camilo Hurtado Castano v. State of Florida

Docket 4D2025-2562

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 16, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 4D2025-2562

Appeal from a criminal judgment entered in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County

Summary

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal reviewed a criminal appeal by Juan Camilo Hurtado Castano from a judgment entered in Martin County Circuit Court (case no. 432024CF001321CFAXMX). The court issued a brief per curiam decision affirming the lower court's judgment. No opinion or reasoning is provided in the published entry; the decision simply affirms the trial court's ruling. The mandate is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Parties

Appellant: Juan Camilo Hurtado Castano
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: William Loy Roby
Attorney: Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender
Attorney: Mara Catherine Herbert, Assistant Public Defender

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-16

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, he should file a timely motion for rehearing in the Fourth District to seek reconsideration before the decision becomes final.
2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If rehearing is denied or not filed, the appellant should consult counsel promptly about whether to seek review by the Florida Supreme Court and prepare any necessary jurisdictional filings.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error that would change the result below.
Does this decision take effect immediately?: The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; if no rehearing is filed or it is denied, the affirmation becomes final.
Who is affected by this ruling?: The appellant, Juan Camilo Hurtado Castano, is directly affected because the trial court's outcome in his criminal case remains in place.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                             FOURTH DISTRICT

                JUAN CAMILO HURTADO CASTANO,
                          Appellant,

                                    v.

                        STATE OF FLORIDA,
                             Appellee.

                          No. 4D2025-2562

                             [April 16, 2026]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
Martin County; William Loy Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No.
432024CF001321CFAXMX.

   Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Mara Catherine Herbert,
Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

  No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

  Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER and SHAW, JJ., concur.

                         *          *           *

  Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.