Krueger v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2025-0956
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-0956
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County
Summary
The District Court of Appeal, Second District of Florida, affirmed the judgment below in an appeal by Chad Krueger against the State of Florida. The court issued a per curiam decision, without published reasoning in this slip opinion, concluding the lower court's ruling should stand. The panel of three judges concurred, and the opinion may still be revised before official publication.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's decision adverse to Chad Krueger should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmation, indicating it found no reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings or ruling. Because the opinion contains no further explanation, the appellate panel's concurrence signals that the legal standards applied below were adequate and that the record did not show a basis for reversal.
Parties
- Appellant
- Chad Krueger
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Frederick Mercurio
- Attorney
- Blair Allen
- Attorney
- Joanna Beth Conner
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
- Attorney
- Clara V. Murga
Key Dates
- decision_date
- 2026-04-24
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to pursue further review, discuss with counsel whether a petition to the Florida Supreme Court is appropriate and whether jurisdictional grounds exist.
- 2
Request opinion publication status
Confirm whether the opinion is revised before official publication and obtain the final published opinion for the record.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, meaning it found no reversible error and let that judgment stand.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The decision affects appellant Chad Krueger and the State of Florida as the appellee, because it upholds the circuit court outcome in their case.
- Does this opinion explain the court's reasoning?
- No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmation without published reasoning in this slip opinion.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Possibly; depending on the case posture, Krueger may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met, but the slip opinion does not address further review.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
CHAD KRUEGER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-0956
April 24, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Frederick Mercurio,
Judge.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public
Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Clara V. Murga,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.