Lane v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2025-0480
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-0480
Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County (Judge Anne Wansboro) of a judgment entered against appellant Mark Alan Lane.
Summary
The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a county court judgment in a criminal or quasi-criminal matter involving Mark Alan Lane, who appealed pro se against the State of Florida. The opinion is unpublished and brief: the panel issued a per curiam decision stating simply 'Affirmed' without extended explanation. The court's judgment upholds the lower court's ruling and leaves the county court's decision intact. No detailed reasoning, factual background, or legal analysis appears in the published entry.
Issue Decided
- Whether the county court's judgment challenged by Mark Alan Lane should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The published docket entry contains only a brief per curiam disposition stating 'Affirmed' and does not provide the court's detailed legal reasoning. The appellate panel therefore upheld the lower court's decision, indicating that the issues raised on appeal did not warrant reversal under applicable law or were insufficiently persuasive to disturb the county court's judgment.
Parties
- Appellant
- Mark Alan Lane
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Anne Wansboro
- Attorney
- Samuel B. Boundy
Key Dates
- Decision Date
- 2026-04-24
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult an attorney promptly
Speak with counsel to determine the exact judgment affirmed, any remaining obligations (fines, restitution, sentences), and whether additional appeal or postconviction relief is available and timely.
- 2
Review appeal deadlines
If seeking further review, confirm deadlines for a petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court or for postconviction motions, and prepare required filings immediately.
- 3
Obtain full opinion and lower-court record
Request the full appellate mandate, county court judgment, and the appellate record to understand the basis of the decision and any factual or legal issues preserved for further action.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the county court's judgment, meaning it left the lower court's decision in place.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The primary parties affected are appellant Mark Alan Lane and the State of Florida; the county court's judgment against Lane remains effective.
- Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No; the court issued a short per curiam disposition saying only 'Affirmed' and did not include a detailed explanation in the published entry.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- Potentially, but further review (such as a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court) would depend on whether there are substantial questions of law or conflicting decisions; the appellate record or counsel can advise on timeliness and grounds.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
MARK ALAN LANE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-0480
April 24, 2026
Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County; Anne Wansboro, Judge.
Mark Alan Lane, pro se.
Samuel B. Boundy, Assistant County Attorney, New Port Richey, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.
__________________________
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2