Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Lane v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2025-0432

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
2D2025-0432

Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County

Summary

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a county court decision in a case where Mark Alan Lane appealed a judgment involving the State of Florida. The appeal was taken pro se by Lane and argued by the Assistant County Attorney for the State. The appellate panel issued a per curiam opinion on April 24, 2026, without published reasoning in the opinion summary, and the court affirmed the lower court's decision. All three judges concurred.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the county court's judgment should be reversed on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a short per curiam affirmance and does not provide detailed reasoning in the published summary. The appellate court reviewed the county court's decision and concluded that the judgment should stand, as reflected by the single-word disposition 'Affirmed' and concurrence by the panel. No additional legal analysis or facts are included in the opinion text provided.

Parties

Appellant
Mark Alan Lane
Appellee
State of Florida
Judge
Anne Wansboro
Attorney
Samuel B. Boundy

Key Dates

decision_date
2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consult counsel about further review

    If an appealable issue remains, consult an attorney promptly to evaluate grounds and deadlines for seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court.

  2. 2

    Obey the county court judgment

    Until and unless the judgment is overturned, comply with any orders or obligations imposed by the county court to avoid sanctions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court affirmed the county court's judgment, meaning the lower-court decision remains in effect.
Who is affected by this decision?
The parties in the case—appellant Mark Alan Lane and the State of Florida—are directly affected because the county court ruling stands.
Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?
No; the published entry is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed legal reasoning in the text provided.
Can this decision be appealed further?
Possibly; a party may seek review in a higher court subject to procedural rules and deadlines, such as by filing a petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court, if jurisdictional requirements are met.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                       SECOND DISTRICT



                          MARK ALAN LANE,

                              Appellant,

                                  v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,

                              Appellee.


                           No. 2D2025-0432



                            April 24, 2026

Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County; Anne Wansboro, Judge.

Mark Alan Lane, pro se.

Samuel B. Boundy, Assistant County Attorney, New Port Richey, for
Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.


KHOUZAM, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.


                     __________________________
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.




                                      2