Lane v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2025-0432
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-0432
Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County
Summary
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a county court decision in a case where Mark Alan Lane appealed a judgment involving the State of Florida. The appeal was taken pro se by Lane and argued by the Assistant County Attorney for the State. The appellate panel issued a per curiam opinion on April 24, 2026, without published reasoning in the opinion summary, and the court affirmed the lower court's decision. All three judges concurred.
Issue Decided
- Whether the county court's judgment should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is a short per curiam affirmance and does not provide detailed reasoning in the published summary. The appellate court reviewed the county court's decision and concluded that the judgment should stand, as reflected by the single-word disposition 'Affirmed' and concurrence by the panel. No additional legal analysis or facts are included in the opinion text provided.
Parties
- Appellant
- Mark Alan Lane
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Anne Wansboro
- Attorney
- Samuel B. Boundy
Key Dates
- decision_date
- 2026-04-24
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult counsel about further review
If an appealable issue remains, consult an attorney promptly to evaluate grounds and deadlines for seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court.
- 2
Obey the county court judgment
Until and unless the judgment is overturned, comply with any orders or obligations imposed by the county court to avoid sanctions.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the county court's judgment, meaning the lower-court decision remains in effect.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties in the case—appellant Mark Alan Lane and the State of Florida—are directly affected because the county court ruling stands.
- Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No; the published entry is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed legal reasoning in the text provided.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- Possibly; a party may seek review in a higher court subject to procedural rules and deadlines, such as by filing a petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court, if jurisdictional requirements are met.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
MARK ALAN LANE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-0432
April 24, 2026
Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County; Anne Wansboro, Judge.
Mark Alan Lane, pro se.
Samuel B. Boundy, Assistant County Attorney, New Port Richey, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.
__________________________
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2