Larry v. State of Florida
Docket 1D2025-0390
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 1D2025-0390
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County (criminal matter).
Summary
The First District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Jaden Delvon Larry from a Bay County circuit court decision. The appellate court issued a short per curiam opinion on May 5, 2026, unanimously concluding that the lower court's judgment should be affirmed. No detailed reasoning, factual background, or legal analysis appears in the published entry; the court simply announced the disposition and noted concurrence by three judges. The opinion is not final until any authorized post-judgment motions are resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment or sentence should be reversed on the grounds raised by appellant Jaden Delvon Larry.
Court's Reasoning
The published entry contains only a one-line per curiam decision affirming the lower court and provides no substantive explanation of the court's legal reasoning. Because the opinion contains no discussion, the appellate court's reasoning cannot be derived from the document beyond its conclusion that the circuit court's judgment was correct.
Parties
- Appellant
- Jaden Delvon Larry
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Brantley Scott Clark, Jr.
- Attorney
- Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender
- Attorney
- Ross Scott Haine, II, Assistant Public Defender
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier, Attorney General
- Attorney
- Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General
Key Dates
- decision
- 2026-05-05
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel about post-opinion motions
If appellant wishes to pursue further review or preservation, counsel should consider filing timely motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 and evaluate grounds for a discretionary petition to the Florida Supreme Court.
- 2
Determine finality and mandate
Confirm whether any authorized motions are filed; if none, obtain the mandate and follow any directives from the circuit court to conclude or continue compliance with the judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, meaning it upheld the lower court's decision.
- Why did the court affirm?
- The opinion is a brief per curiam entry that gives no explanation, so the court's underlying reasoning is not included in this document.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The decision affects appellant Jaden Delvon Larry and the State of Florida in the underlying criminal case by leaving the circuit court's ruling in place.
- Can this be appealed further?
- The opinion notes it is not final until any timely motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 are resolved; further review to the Florida Supreme Court could be possible if authorized and timely sought.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-0390
_____________________________
JADEN DELVON LARRY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.
Brantley Scott Clark, Jr., Judge.
May 5, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
RAY, WINOKUR, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross Scott Haine, II,
Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2