What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision; the one-line entry states 'AFFIRMED.'

Who does this affect?

It affects the appellant, Marlo Michelle Lauritzen, and the State of Florida as appellee; it upholds the circuit court's ruling.

Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No. The published entry is a short per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's reasoning or factual background.

Can this decision be further appealed?

Potentially, subject to Florida appellate rules and any timely and authorized motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331; specific appeal options are not discussed in the entry.

Lauritzen v. State of Florida

Docket 1D2024-2629

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 20, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 1D2024-2629

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County in a criminal matter

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the criminal case of Marlo Michelle Lauritzen. The appeal, from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, was decided per curiam on April 20, 2026, with Judges Lewis, Rowe, and Nordby concurring. The opinion contains a single-line disposition: AFFIRMED. No additional reasoning, issues, or factual background is provided in the published entry.

Parties

Appellant: Marlo Michelle Lauritzen
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Linda L. Nobles
Attorney: Jessica J. Yeary
Attorney: Tyler K. Payne
Attorney: James Uthmeier

Key Dates

decision_date: 2026-04-20

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing timely post-opinion motions
If the appellant seeks further relief, they should consult counsel about filing any authorized motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 within the applicable deadlines.
2
Evaluate grounds for further appeal
Discuss with counsel whether there are certiorari or discretionary review options to a higher court and whether any preserved issues warrant such review.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision; the one-line entry states 'AFFIRMED.'
Who does this affect?: It affects the appellant, Marlo Michelle Lauritzen, and the State of Florida as appellee; it upholds the circuit court's ruling.
Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No. The published entry is a short per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's reasoning or factual background.
Can this decision be further appealed?: Potentially, subject to Florida appellate rules and any timely and authorized motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331; specific appeal options are not discussed in the entry.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2024-2629
                 _____________________________

MARLO MICHELLE LAURITZEN,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

                        April 20, 2026


PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler K. Payne, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.




                               2