What did the appeals court decide?

The District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the circuit court's decision.

Does this opinion explain the court's reasons?

No. The published document is a short per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's reasoning or legal analysis.

Who is affected by this decision?

The immediate parties are appellant Anthony R. Medina and the State of Florida; the affirmance preserves the circuit court's ruling against Medina.

Can this be appealed further?

Potential further review may be available by petitioning the Florida Supreme Court, but this document does not state whether a timely petition was or can be filed.

Medina v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2024-2699

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 24, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2024-2699

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County

Summary

The appellate court reviewed an appeal brought by Anthony R. Medina from a decision of the Circuit Court for Manatee County. The District Court of Appeal summarily affirmed the lower court's judgment without published opinion on April 24, 2026. The per curiam decision states only the disposition (affirmed) and notes concurrence by the three judges; no explanatory reasoning or legal analysis is included in the document provided.

Parties

Appellant: Anthony R. Medina
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Frederick P. Mercurio
Attorney: Blair Allen, Public Defender
Attorney: Kimberly Nolen Hopkins, Assistant Public Defender
Attorney: James Uthmeier, Attorney General

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to seek further review, they should promptly consult counsel to evaluate grounds and deadlines for a petition to the Florida Supreme Court.
2
Check mandate and deadlines
Confirm the appellate mandate date and any remaining deadlines for post-conviction or collateral relief to preserve rights.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the circuit court's decision.
Does this opinion explain the court's reasons?: No. The published document is a short per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's reasoning or legal analysis.
Who is affected by this decision?: The immediate parties are appellant Anthony R. Medina and the State of Florida; the affirmance preserves the circuit court's ruling against Medina.
Can this be appealed further?: Potential further review may be available by petitioning the Florida Supreme Court, but this document does not state whether a timely petition was or can be filed.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT



                          ANTHONY R. MEDINA,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.


                             No. 2D2024-2699



                               April 24, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Frederick P.
Mercurio, Judge.

Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Kimberly Nolen Hopkins, Assistant
Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

LUCAS, C.J., and VILLANTI and SMITH, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.