Meier v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2025-2163
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-2163
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County
Summary
The District Court of Appeal, Second District, affirmed the lower court's decision in the appeal brought by Scott Meier against the State of Florida. The panel issued a per curiam opinion on April 17, 2026, concluding that the trial court's judgment should stand. No reasoning or detailed factual findings were provided in the published entry, and three judges (Black, Atkinson, Smith) concurred. The appeal arose from the Manatee County Circuit Court before Judge Frederick P. Mercurio.
Issue Decided
- Whether the trial court's judgment should be reversed on appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The published docket entry contains only a per curiam affirmation and does not state the court's legal reasoning or the grounds for affirmance. Because the opinion is limited to a one-line disposition, the appellate panel affirmed the lower court without an accompanying written explanation in this entry.
Parties
- Appellant
- Scott Meier
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Frederick P. Mercurio
- Attorney
- Peter Lombardo
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
- Attorney
- Cynthia Richards
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-17
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to continue, consult counsel promptly to evaluate grounds for seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court and to determine applicable filing deadlines.
- 2
Request opinion or mandate details
Obtain the appellate mandate and any available written opinion or docket entries from the clerk to confirm the scope of the affirmance and any remaining obligations.
- 3
Evaluate postjudgment remedies
If appropriate, consider filing motions in the trial court (for example, for a new trial or sentencing relief) or initiating collateral proceedings, based on counsel's assessment of preserved issues.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment and denied reversal; the per curiam entry contains no further explanation.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The primary parties affected are appellant Scott Meier and the State of Florida; the affirmed judgment from the Manatee County Circuit Court remains in effect.
- Does this entry explain why the court affirmed?
- No. The entry is a brief per curiam affirmation and does not include the court's reasoning or legal analysis.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- Possibly. The next step would typically be to seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to its discretionary jurisdiction and any applicable deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
SCOTT MEIER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-2163
April 17, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Frederick P.
Mercurio, Judge.
Peter Lombardo of Law Office of Peter Lombardo, Bradenton, for
Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
BLACK, ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.