Mills v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2025-3440
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-3440
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County
Summary
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal reviewed a pro se criminal appeal by Kenneth E. Mills from the circuit court in Pinellas County under the rule for appeals in criminal cases. After considering the record, the panel issued a per curiam decision affirming the lower court's judgment. The opinion is brief, provides no published reasoning, and notes it may be revised before official publication. The judges concurred and the decision was entered on April 29, 2026.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment or sentence should be reversed on appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmance without published opinion or extended reasoning, indicating the appellate panel found no reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings or outcome. Because the decision contains no stated grounds, the court's action reflects that the issues raised did not warrant reversal under applicable standards for review.
Parties
- Appellant
- Kenneth E. Mills
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Larry Keith Meyer, Jr.
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
If the appellant wishes to pursue further review, he should promptly consult an attorney about the possibility and timeliness of seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court.
- 2
Check for motion/rehearing deadlines
Determine whether a motion for rehearing or rehearing en banc is available and file within the time limits for such motions under Florida appellate rules.
- 3
Review lower-court options
If there are collateral remedies (for example, postconviction relief), the appellant should evaluate those options with counsel and note any filing deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error in the matters raised on appeal.
- Who is affected by this ruling?
- Appellant Kenneth E. Mills is directly affected because his appeal was rejected; the State of Florida remains the prevailing party.
- Does this opinion explain why the appeal was denied?
- No. The court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a written opinion explaining its reasoning.
- Can this decision be further appealed?
- Potentially. Depending on the nature of the conviction and sentence, Mills may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, but he should consult counsel about deadlines and jurisdictional requirements.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
KENNETH E. MILLS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-3440
April 29, 2026
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
Pinellas County; Larry Keith Meyer, Jr., Judge.
Kenneth E. Mills, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LUCAS, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.