What did the court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Who is affected by this decision?

The primary parties affected are the appellant, Saladine Fageeh Monroe, and the State of Florida as appellee.

Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No substantive reasoning or explanation is included in this short per curiam entry.

Can this decision be appealed further?

A party may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, typically by filing a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction, subject to applicable rules and deadlines; consult counsel for specifics.

Monroe v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2025-1639

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: May 6, 2026 · today
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2025-1639

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County

Summary

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal issued a per curiam decision affirming the lower court's judgment in a criminal appeal. The appellate panel, consisting of three judges, reviewed the appeal from the Sarasota County Circuit Court and concluded that the trial court's decision should be upheld. No detailed reasoning, factual background, or legal analysis appears in the published entry beyond the single-word disposition "Affirmed." The decision is subject to revision prior to official publication.

Parties

Appellant: Saladine Fageeh Monroe
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Dana Moss
Attorney: Blair Allen
Attorney: Kimberly Nolen Hopkins
Attorney: James Uthmeier
Attorney: Tayna Alexander

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-05-06

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to pursue further review, contact counsel promptly to consider seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and to confirm filing deadlines.
2
Request rehearing or clarification if appropriate
If the appellant believes there are grounds, counsel can evaluate whether to file a motion for rehearing or certification within the timeframe set by appellate rules.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.
Who is affected by this decision?: The primary parties affected are the appellant, Saladine Fageeh Monroe, and the State of Florida as appellee.
Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No substantive reasoning or explanation is included in this short per curiam entry.
Can this decision be appealed further?: A party may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, typically by filing a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction, subject to applicable rules and deadlines; consult counsel for specifics.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT

                      SALADINE FAGEEH MONROE,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.

                             No. 2D2025-1639


                                May 6, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Dana Moss, Judge.

Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Kimberly Nolen Hopkins, Assistant
Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tayna Alexander,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.