Norman Williams v. State of Florida
Docket 3D2026-0339
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 3D2026-0339
Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County (Ramiro C. Areces, Judge).
Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal considered an appeal by Norman Williams from a Miami-Dade County circuit court decision. The appeal was taken under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appellate court, in a per curiam decision, affirmed the lower court's ruling. No published opinion or extended reasoning appears in the filed entry; the judgment simply affirms the trial court's disposition and notes the decision is not final until any timely rehearing motion is resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's ruling in Norman Williams's criminal case should be reversed on appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a brief per curiam disposition affirming the lower court. No substantive reasoning, factual findings, or legal analysis is provided in the published entry; the affirmance indicates the appellate panel found no reversible error in the circuit court's ruling. The opinion notes it is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved, preserving standard procedural protections.
Parties
- Appellant
- Norman Williams
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Ramiro C. Areces
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
Key Dates
- Opinion filed
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes the panel overlooked controlling law or facts, he should timely file a motion for rehearing in the Third District as permitted by the court's rules.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel
The appellant should consult with an attorney experienced in criminal appeals to evaluate grounds for rehearing or further review and to meet appellate filing deadlines.
- 3
Prepare for post-decision deadlines
If no rehearing is filed or rehearing is denied, the appellant should determine deadlines for seeking further appellate review and any obligations arising from the affirmed judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling and denied relief to the appellant, Norman Williams.
- Does this decision take effect immediately?
- The opinion states it is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved, so it may not be final immediately.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- Norman Williams, as the appellant, is directly affected; the State of Florida prevailed and the lower-court disposition stands.
- Can this be appealed further?
- If a timely motion for rehearing is denied, the appellant may seek further review that is available under Florida law, such as a petition to the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed April 29, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D26-0339
Lower Tribunal No. F06-31737
________________
Norman Williams,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.
Norman Williams, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.