Pleas v. State of Florida
Docket 1D2025-1634
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 1D2025-1634
Appeal to the First District Court of Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County (judge Lance E. Neff).
Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in a criminal/post-conviction matter brought by appellant Pythis Pleas. The per curiam opinion, issued April 29, 2026, contains a single-line disposition: AFFIRMED. The panel (Bilbrey, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ.) concurred and noted the decision is not final until any timely permitted motions under Florida appellate rules are resolved. No reasoning, factual background, or legal analysis is included in the published entry.
Parties
- Appellant
- Pythis Pleas
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Lance E. Neff
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier, Attorney General
- Attorney
- Amanda Uwaibi, Assistant Attorney General
Key Dates
- decision_date
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing permitted appellate motions
If the appellant believes there are grounds, they should timely file a motion for rehearing or clarification under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 within the deadline.
- 2
Consult counsel about further review
Discuss with an attorney whether a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court is appropriate and whether jurisdictional criteria are satisfied.
- 3
Comply with the affirmed judgment
Unless and until further relief is obtained, the appellant should comply with the trial court's judgment and any related orders affirmed by this decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision — it denied the relief the appellant sought on appeal.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The appellant, Pythis Pleas, and the State of Florida are directly affected; the underlying criminal-case parties and the trial-court judgment remain as affirmed.
- Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?
- No substantive reasoning or legal analysis is provided in this short per curiam entry; it contains only the disposition 'AFFIRMED.'
- Can this decision be challenged further?
- A party may seek rehearing or other permitted post-judgment motions under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331, and if applicable, may seek review in the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-1634
_____________________________
PYTHIS PLEAS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Lance E. Neff, Judge.
April 29, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Pythis Pleas, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Amanda Uwaibi,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2