What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the circuit court's decision, meaning the lower court's ruling stands.

Who is affected by this decision?

The decision directly affects appellant Quantavious Piglor and the State of Florida in the underlying criminal case.

Why didn't the opinion explain the court's reasoning?

This entry is a short per curiam affirmance that does not include an extended written opinion; such entries sometimes indicate the panel found no reversible error without publishing detailed analysis.

Can this be appealed further?

A party may seek further review, such as filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or seeking discretionary review from the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable deadlines and jurisdictional rules.

Quantavious Piglor v. State of Florida

Docket 6D2024-2715

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 28, 2026 · 3 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2024-2715

Appeal from a criminal proceeding in the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal reviewed Quantavious Piglor's appeal from a Polk County circuit court criminal matter and unanimously affirmed the lower court's decision. The opinion is per curiam, brief, and provides no extended reasoning in the published entry. The panel of Judges White, Brownlee, and Kamoutsas concurred. The public defender and assistant attorney general represented the parties. The court's judgment affirms the trial court judgment or order under review and ends this stage of the appeal unless a timely rehearing is filed.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment or order in the underlying criminal case should be reversed on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The decision is a short per curiam affirmance without published reasoning; the panel affirmed the circuit court's ruling, indicating that the appellant's arguments did not persuade the appellate court to reverse, vacate, or remand. Because no substantive opinion was provided, the appellate court did not articulate legal rules or factual findings that changed the outcome.

Parties

Appellant: Quantavious Piglor
Appellee: State of Florida
Attorney: Blair Allen, Public Defender
Attorney: Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender
Attorney: James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Attorney: Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General
Judge: Sharon M. Franklin
Judge: White, J.
Judge: Brownlee, J.
Judge: Kamoutsas, J.

Key Dates

Opinion date: 2026-04-28

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes the court overlooked legal points, they may file a timely motion for rehearing in the district court within the deadline specified by court rules.
2
Assess grounds for further review
If rehearing is denied or not filed, evaluate whether to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court based on important legal questions or conflicts among decisions.
3
Consult defense counsel about enforcement
The appellant should consult counsel to determine how the affirmance affects sentencing, incarceration, or other enforcement and whether any postconviction remedies remain available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the circuit court's decision, meaning the lower court's ruling stands.
Who is affected by this decision?: The decision directly affects appellant Quantavious Piglor and the State of Florida in the underlying criminal case.
Why didn't the opinion explain the court's reasoning?: This entry is a short per curiam affirmance that does not include an extended written opinion; such entries sometimes indicate the panel found no reversible error without publishing detailed analysis.
Can this be appealed further?: A party may seek further review, such as filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or seeking discretionary review from the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable deadlines and jurisdictional rules.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                       STATE OF FLORIDA
                      _____________________________

                           Case No. 6D2024-2715
                     Lower Tribunal No. 2024-CF-002247
                      _____________________________

                            QUANTAVIOUS PIGLOR,

                                  Appellant,

                                      v.

                              STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.

                      _____________________________

                Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.
                          Sharon M. Franklin, Judge.

                                April 28, 2026

PER CURIAM.

      AFFIRMED.

WHITE, BROWNLEE and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.


Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender,
Bartow, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
          AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED