What did the court decide?

The appellate court dismissed the appeal. The one-line disposition provides no explanation in this entry.

Who is affected by this decision?

Appellant Denice Ranee Reavely and the State of Florida are the parties named; the dismissal affects Reavely’s right to have the county-court action reviewed on this appeal unless further action is taken.

Why did the court dismiss the appeal?

The published entry does not state a reason. The court provided only the disposition “Dismissed” with no accompanying opinion or reasoning.

Can this be appealed further?

Possibly, but the entry does not address further review. A party seeking further review should consult counsel promptly about available relief, deadlines, and grounds for rehearing or discretionary review.

Reavely v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2025-0792

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealDismissed

Filed: May 1, 2026 · today
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Dismissed
Docket: 2D2025-0792

Appeal from the County Court for Hillsborough County (Judge Frances M. Perrone).

Summary

The District Court of Appeal, Second District, dismissed Denice Ranee Reavely’s appeal from a Hillsborough County Court decision. The filing shows the case was before a three-judge panel, and the court’s one-line per curiam disposition simply states “Dismissed.” No reasoning, factual background, or legal analysis appears in the published entry, and the opinion is marked subject to revision before official publication.

Parties

Appellant: Denice Ranee Reavely
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Frances M. Perrone

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-05-01

What You Should Do Next

1
Request clarification or rehearing
If you believe the dismissal was in error or lacks explanation, consider filing a motion for rehearing or clarification with the appellate court promptly, observing the court's procedural deadlines.
2
Consult an attorney
Contact appellate counsel to review the county-court record and determine whether grounds exist for rehearing, motion for extension, or application for further review to the Florida Supreme Court.
3
Confirm deadlines
Verify the applicable post-decision deadlines (rehearing, motion for certification, or petition for review) and ensure any filings are timely made if you intend to pursue additional relief.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court dismissed the appeal. The one-line disposition provides no explanation in this entry.
Who is affected by this decision?: Appellant Denice Ranee Reavely and the State of Florida are the parties named; the dismissal affects Reavely’s right to have the county-court action reviewed on this appeal unless further action is taken.
Why did the court dismiss the appeal?: The published entry does not state a reason. The court provided only the disposition “Dismissed” with no accompanying opinion or reasoning.
Can this be appealed further?: Possibly, but the entry does not address further review. A party seeking further review should consult counsel promptly about available relief, deadlines, and grounds for rehearing or discretionary review.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT



                        DENICE RANEE REAVELY,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.


                             No. 2D2025-0792



                                May 1, 2026

Appeal from the County Court for Hillsborough County; Frances M.
Perrone, Judge.

Denice Ranee Reavely, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marena S. Ramirez,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

      Dismissed.


LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.



Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.