Roberson v. State of Florida
Docket 1D2025-1766
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 1D2025-1766
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County
Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal reviewed Walter Jim Roberson Jr.'s appeal from a Bay County circuit court decision. The court issued a per curiam opinion on April 16, 2026, and affirmed the lower court's ruling. No published opinion or extended reasoning appears in the document; the three-judge panel (Roberts, Ray, and Treadwell) concurred. The decision is subject to timely post-judgment motions under Florida appellate rules before it becomes final.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment or order (as appealed by Roberson) should be reversed or modified
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is a one-line per curiam affirmance without published reasoning. The appellate panel affirmed the lower court's decision, indicating they found no reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings or ruling. Because no further explanation is provided, the court relied on the record and applicable law to conclude the appeal lacked merit.
Parties
- Appellant
- Walter Jim Roberson Jr
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Shonna Young Gay
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier, Attorney General
- Attorney
- Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-16
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing post-judgment motions
If eligible, Roberson should promptly evaluate and, if appropriate, file timely motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 to seek reconsideration or rehearing.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel
Roberson should consult an attorney experienced in criminal appeals to review the record and advise on preservation of issues, possible grounds for further review, or federal habeas options if applicable.
- 3
Monitor finality deadlines
Confirm the deadline for filing any rehearing or further review petitions so no opportunity to challenge the decision is lost.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The court affirmed the circuit court's decision, meaning it found no basis to reverse or change the lower court's ruling.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- Appellant Walter Jim Roberson Jr. and the State of Florida are the parties affected; the circuit court's judgment as to Roberson remains in effect.
- Can the decision be challenged further?
- The opinion notes it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331; further review to the Florida Supreme Court may be possible in limited circumstances.
- Why did the court affirm if there is no explanation?
- Per curiam affirmances are often used when the panel concludes the record and governing law do not disclose reversible error; the opinion itself does not provide the detailed reasoning.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-1766
_____________________________
WALTER JIM ROBERSON JR,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.
Shonna Young Gay, Judge.
April 16, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, RAY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Walter Jim Roberson Jr, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2