Scott v. State of Florida
Docket 1D2025-1972
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 1D2025-1972
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County (presumably from a criminal judgment or order)
Summary
The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in a case filed by appellant Tony L. Scott against the State of Florida. The opinion is per curiam, dated April 24, 2026, and states simply 'AFFIRMED' without additional published reasoning. The panel of judges (Rowe, Nordby, and Long) concurred. The clerk notes the decision is not final until any timely, authorized motions under Florida appellate rules are resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the trial court's ruling (challenged by Tony L. Scott) should be reversed
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is per curiam and contains no published explanatory reasoning; the court announced the result 'AFFIRMED.' Because no law or factual analysis is provided in the text, the appellate court's basis for affirming is not stated in the document.
Parties
- Appellant
- Tony L. Scott
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- John L. Miller, Jr.
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-24
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider post-opinion motions
If appellants wish to challenge the result, they should consider filing any timely motions authorized by Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331; check deadlines and procedural requirements immediately.
- 2
Consult a criminal appeals attorney
Because the opinion contains no reasoning, a lawyer can review the appellate record and trial-court rulings to identify any basis for rehearing, certification, or discretionary review.
- 3
Prepare for execution of the underlying judgment
Unless further relief is obtained, parties should take steps to comply with or enforce the trial-court judgment that was affirmed.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it rejected the appellant's challenge.
- Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No. The per curiam opinion contains only the single-word disposition 'AFFIRMED' and provides no explanatory reasoning in this document.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- Appellant Tony L. Scott and the State of Florida are directly affected; the underlying criminal-case outcome in the trial court remains in place unless changed by further authorized motions.
- Can this decision be further appealed?
- Potential further relief may be available by filing timely and authorized motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331, or by seeking discretionary review if permitted; consult counsel for deadlines and options.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-1972
_____________________________
TONY L. SCOTT,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
John L. Miller, Jr., Judge.
April 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Tony L. Scott, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.