Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Stravious B. Johnson v. State of Florida

Docket 4D2025-1112

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
4D2025-1112

Appeal from a criminal judgment and sentence in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County.

Summary

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment below in a criminal case. The appeal by Stravious B. Johnson from his conviction/sentencing in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County, was reviewed and the appellate panel unanimously affirmed the lower court's decision. The opinion is per curiam, with concurrence from all three judges. The opinion does not state detailed reasoning in the published entry and notes the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the trial court's judgment and sentence should be reversed on the grounds raised by appellant in the appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a published, detailed opinion in this entry. The panel unanimously concurred in affirming the lower court, indicating that the appellate court found no reversible error in the matters raised by appellant. The decision is subject to potential change if a timely motion for rehearing is filed and granted.

Parties

Appellant
Stravious B. Johnson
Appellee
State of Florida
Judge
Michael James Linn
Attorney
Daniel Eisinger
Attorney
Alan Terry Lipson
Attorney
James Uthmeier
Attorney
Nathanial LeBlanc

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-04-30

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion for rehearing

    If the appellant wishes to seek reconsideration, a timely motion for rehearing should be filed in the Fourth District Court of Appeal according to the court's rules.

  2. 2

    Evaluate grounds for further review

    If the rehearing is denied, the appellant should consult counsel to determine whether to seek review from the Florida Supreme Court and whether jurisdictional criteria are met.

  3. 3

    Consult defense counsel about post-conviction options

    Discuss any collateral remedies or relief (for example, postconviction motions) that may be available depending on the case facts and issues preserved on appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment and sentence, meaning it found no reversible error in the matters raised on appeal in this entry.
Who does this affect?
This affects the appellant, Stravious B. Johnson, and the State of Florida; it upholds the conviction/sentence as affirmed by the appeals court.
Is the decision final?
Not yet; the opinion notes the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Can this be appealed further?
Yes — after disposition of any rehearing motion, the appellant may seek further review, such as filing a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                      STRAVIOUS B. JOHNSON,
                            Appellant,

                                     v.

                         STATE OF FLORIDA,
                              Appellee.

                           No. 4D2025-1112

                              [April 30, 2026]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.
Lucie County; Michael James Linn, Judge; L.T. Case No.
562019CF002899AXXXXX.

  Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Alan Terry Lipson, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

   James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nathanial
LeBlanc, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

KUNTZ, C.J., and MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

                          *          *           *

   Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.