What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision; the short per curiam opinion does not explain the court's reasoning.

Who is affected by this decision?

The primary parties affected are appellant Rashad J. Taylor and the State of Florida; the lower-court outcome remains in place.

Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No. The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance and contains no substantive legal analysis in the text provided.

Can this decision be appealed further?

Potential further review (such as discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court) may be available in some circumstances, but this opinion gives no details about preservation or grounds for further appeal.

Taylor v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2026-0253

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 29, 2026 · 2 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2026-0253

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal of Florida reviewed an appeal by Rashad J. Taylor from a Hillsborough County circuit court under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appellate court issued a per curiam decision affirming the lower court's ruling. The opinion is brief, gives no published reasoning beyond the affirmation, and notes that the opinion may be revised before official publication.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's ruling challenged by Rashad J. Taylor should be reversed under rule 9.141(b)(2) review

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is per curiam and provides no substantive explanation; the court affirmed the circuit court's decision without publishing reasoning in this notice. Because no legal analysis appears in the text, the appellate court's disposition is limited to affirmance.

Parties

Appellant: Rashad J. Taylor
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Lawrence Mark Lefler

Key Dates

Appellate decision date: 2026-04-29

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
Speak with an experienced appellate attorney promptly to evaluate grounds for further review, preservation of issues, and possible filing of a motion for rehearing or a petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court.
2
Request opinion or clarification if needed
If the reasoning is necessary for further action, counsel may check for any subsequent published version of the opinion or move for rehearing in the district court to obtain clarification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision; the short per curiam opinion does not explain the court's reasoning.
Who is affected by this decision?: The primary parties affected are appellant Rashad J. Taylor and the State of Florida; the lower-court outcome remains in place.
Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No. The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance and contains no substantive legal analysis in the text provided.
Can this decision be appealed further?: Potential further review (such as discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court) may be available in some circumstances, but this opinion gives no details about preservation or grounds for further appeal.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT


                           RASHAD J. TAYLOR,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.


                             No. 2D2026-0253



                               April 29, 2026

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Lawrence Mark Lefler, Judge.


PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.

LUCAS, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.