What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment; the short entry gives no further explanation.

Who is affected by this decision?

The decision affects appellant Shawn A. Tyson and the State of Florida as appellee; it upholds the lower court's ruling as to the parties.

Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No. The per curiam entry contains no substantive reasoning or citation of authorities.

Can this be appealed further?

Potential further review (for example, by the Florida Supreme Court) would depend on statutory and rule-based criteria such as jurisdiction and timeliness; the entry itself does not address further appeal rights.

Tyson v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2025-3229

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 29, 2026 · 2 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2025-3229

Appeal from a circuit court judgment in Sarasota County pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Shawn A. Tyson from a Sarasota County circuit court order. The appellate court issued a brief per curiam decision and affirmed the lower court's judgment. No opinion content or legal reasoning is provided in the published entry beyond the single-word disposition and noting that the judgment is subject to revision prior to official publication.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment or order challenged by Shawn A. Tyson should be reversed or modified on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The published entry contains no substantive explanation of the court's legal analysis; the court issued a per curiam affirmation without elaboration. Because the opinion provides no discussion of legal standards or factual application, the specific reasons for affirmance are not stated in the document.

Parties

Appellant: Shawn A. Tyson
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Thomas Krug
Judge: LaROSE
Judge: MORRIS
Judge: ATKINSON

Key Dates

decision_date: 2026-04-29

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
If you are the appellant and believe there are grounds for further review, promptly consult appellate counsel to evaluate whether to seek rehearing or discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and to check any applicable deadlines.
2
Request opinion or clarification
If more detail about the basis for affirmance is needed, counsel may request issuance of a written opinion or seek clarification from the clerk about whether a full opinion will follow.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment; the short entry gives no further explanation.
Who is affected by this decision?: The decision affects appellant Shawn A. Tyson and the State of Florida as appellee; it upholds the lower court's ruling as to the parties.
Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No. The per curiam entry contains no substantive reasoning or citation of authorities.
Can this be appealed further?: Potential further review (for example, by the Florida Supreme Court) would depend on statutory and rule-based criteria such as jurisdiction and timeliness; the entry itself does not address further appeal rights.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT



                            SHAWN A. TYSON,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.


                             No. 2D2025-3229



                               April 29, 2026

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.




PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.


LaROSE, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.