What did the court decide?

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's decision; the short entry gives no further explanation.

Who is affected by this decision?

Appellant Michelle Vasquez and the State of Florida are the parties affected; the lower-court judgment against or involving Vasquez remains in place.

Does this decision become final immediately?

Not immediately; the decision is not final until any timely authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 is resolved.

Can this decision be further appealed?

Potentially, depending on whether Vasquez files timely motions or seeks review in the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable rules and jurisdictional requirements.

Vasquez v. State of Florida

Docket 1D2025-0862

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 16, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 1D2025-0862

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal reviewed Michelle Vasquez's appeal from a Santa Rosa County circuit court decision. The three-judge panel issued a per curiam opinion on April 16, 2026, concluding only that the lower court's ruling should be affirmed. No written opinion explaining the court's reasoning is included in the filing; the entry simply records affirmance and notes the decision is not final until any timely authorized motion under Florida appellate rules is resolved.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment or order (unspecified in this entry) should be reversed or affirmed on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The document provides only a per curiam affirmance without explanation, so no substantive reasoning is stated. The court affirmed the lower-court decision as presented in the appeal record. The entry reserves potential finality pending any timely authorized post-judgment motions under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Authorities Cited

Florida Rules of Appellate ProcedureFla. R. App. P. 9.330, 9.331

Parties

Appellant: Michelle Vasquez
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Clifton A. Drake
Attorney: James Uthmeier, Attorney General

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-16

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider post-judgment appellate motions
If the appellant wishes to challenge the affirmance, she should consult counsel about timely filing an authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
2
Evaluate further review options
Determine whether a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court is available and timely if there are grounds for further appellate review.
3
Consult an attorney
Appellant should consult an attorney to review the appellate record and advise on practical and legal options following affirmance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's decision; the short entry gives no further explanation.
Who is affected by this decision?: Appellant Michelle Vasquez and the State of Florida are the parties affected; the lower-court judgment against or involving Vasquez remains in place.
Does this decision become final immediately?: Not immediately; the decision is not final until any timely authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 is resolved.
Can this decision be further appealed?: Potentially, depending on whether Vasquez files timely motions or seeks review in the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable rules and jurisdictional requirements.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2025-0862
                 _____________________________

MICHELLE VASQUEZ,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.
Clifton A. Drake, Judge.


                         April 16, 2026

PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
              _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Michelle Vasquez, pro se, Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.