Walter B. Campbell v. State of Florida
Docket 3D2026-0578
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 3D2026-0578
Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County
Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal issued a brief per curiam opinion on April 29, 2026, affirming the judgment of the Miami-Dade County Circuit Court in the appeal brought by Walter B. Campbell. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). No published opinion or extended reasoning is provided in the document; the court simply states the disposition as "Affirmed."
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment (reviewable under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)) should be reversed
Authorities Cited
- Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)
Parties
- Appellant
- Walter B. Campbell
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Ramiro C. Areces
- Judge
- FERNANDEZ
- Judge
- GORDO
- Judge
- BOKOR
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
Key Dates
- Opinion filed
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If appellant believes there are grounds, file a timely motion for rehearing in the Third District within the deadline prescribed by the appellate rules.
- 2
Consult counsel about further review
Speak with appellate counsel to evaluate whether to seek review by the Florida Supreme Court or pursue any collateral relief, and to confirm applicable deadlines.
- 3
Confirm effect of the affirmed judgment
Ensure compliance with the circuit court's judgment and obtain clarification from counsel about any sentence, obligations, or collateral consequences that remain in place.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The immediate parties are appellant Walter B. Campbell and the State of Florida; the lower-court judgment remains in effect as to Campbell.
- Why did the court affirm?
- The published document provides no substantive reasoning; it issues a per curiam affirmance without an explained opinion.
- Can this decision be challenged further?
- Potential further review could include a timely motion for rehearing in the district court and, if appropriate, a petition to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable rules and time limits.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed April 29, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D26-0578
Lower Tribunal No. F03-13612
________________
Walter B. Campbell,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.
Walter B. Campbell, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.