White v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2024-2209
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2024-2209
Appeal from the County Court for Pinellas County
Summary
The Second District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a county court judgment in a criminal/procedural matter. The appeal was brought pro se by Rosea Maria White and was argued on the record from Pinellas County before Judge Diane M. Croff. The panel, in a per curiam decision, unanimously affirmed the lower court’s ruling without published opinion, and the judgment stands as decided by the county court. No additional reasoning or substantive analysis was provided in the published entry.
Issue Decided
- Whether the county court's judgment being appealed should be reversed
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is per curiam and provides no detailed reasoning; the appellate panel reviewed the record and unanimously concluded that the county court's decision should be upheld. Because the court affirmed, it found no reversible error in the lower court proceedings or the judgment on the record presented.
Parties
- Appellant
- Rosea Maria White
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Diane M. Croff
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-17
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult counsel about further review options
If you wish to pursue additional review, speak with an attorney promptly to evaluate grounds and deadlines for rehearing or discretionary review by a higher court.
- 2
Check and comply with the county court's judgment
Ensure you understand any obligations imposed by the county court's judgment and take required actions, such as payment, compliance, or scheduling, to avoid further consequences.
- 3
Consider filing a motion for rehearing if appropriate
If there are grounds such as overlooked material issues or procedural errors, a timely motion for rehearing in the district court may be an available step; consult counsel about deadlines and merits.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the county court's judgment, meaning the lower court's decision remains in effect.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The primary parties affected are appellant Rosea Maria White and the State of Florida; the county court judgment against or involving White remains unchanged.
- Why did the court affirm?
- The per curiam entry gives no detailed explanation, indicating the panel found no reversible error in the record presented on appeal.
- Can this be appealed further?
- A party may seek further review, such as a motion for rehearing or review by the Florida Supreme Court, but availability depends on jurisdictional and procedural rules and timelines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ROSEA MARIA WHITE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-2209
April 17, 2026
Appeal from the County Court for Pinellas County; Diane M. Croff,
Judge.
Rosea Maria White, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.