What did the appellate court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's decision; the brief per curiam opinion contains only the single word “Affirmed.”

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties are Doderick Woods-Smith (the appellant) and the State of Florida (the appellee); the result leaves the circuit court's judgment or sentence in place.

Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No. The published entry provides no reasoning or factual explanation.

Can this decision be appealed further?

Possibly. A defendant in a criminal appeal may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court under its jurisdiction or file postconviction motions, but deadlines and grounds vary; the appellant should consult counsel about available options and deadlines.

Woods-Smith v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2026-0225

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 24, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2026-0225

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County.

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in a criminal appeal brought by Doderick Woods-Smith against the State of Florida. The appeal was taken under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County. The per curiam opinion is brief and simply states “Affirmed,” with three judges concurring. No additional reasoning, factual background, or legal analysis is included in the published opinion.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment or sentence should be reversed on appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is per curiam and contains no stated reasoning; the court simply affirmed the lower court's decision. Because no analysis or legal rationale was provided in the published entry, specific legal rules or factual application are not articulated in the opinion.

Parties

Appellant: Doderick Woods-Smith
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Don T. Hall

Key Dates

Opinion date: 2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
Discuss whether further review to the Florida Supreme Court is available or appropriate and evaluate any procedural deadlines for a jurisdictional petition or other postconviction relief.
2
Confirm mandate and enforcement
Check with the circuit court clerk to determine when the appellate mandate issues and whether any sentencing or custody actions will follow.
3
Consider postconviction remedies
If there are unraised or constitutional claims, evaluate filing motions under applicable postconviction rules and statutes with attention to timeliness and procedural prerequisites.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appellate court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's decision; the brief per curiam opinion contains only the single word “Affirmed.”
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties are Doderick Woods-Smith (the appellant) and the State of Florida (the appellee); the result leaves the circuit court's judgment or sentence in place.
Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No. The published entry provides no reasoning or factual explanation.
Can this decision be appealed further?: Possibly. A defendant in a criminal appeal may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court under its jurisdiction or file postconviction motions, but deadlines and grounds vary; the appellant should consult counsel about available options and deadlines.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                            SECOND DISTRICT


                          DODERICK WOODS-SMITH,

                                    Appellant,

                                         v.

                              STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                     Appellee.


                                No. 2D2026-0225



                                  April 24, 2026

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
DeSoto County; Don T. Hall, Judge.


PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.