Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Young v. State of Florida

Docket 1D2025-3354

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealDismissed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Dismissed
Docket
1D2025-3354

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal dismissed Da’vhon Young’s appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. The per curiam opinion consists only of the single-word disposition “DISMISSED” with concurrence from three judges. No substantive reasoning or discussion of issues appears in the published entry, and the opinion notes that it is not final until any timely authorized motion under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure is resolved.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the appeal presented in case No. 1D2025-3354 was properly before the First District Court of Appeal (implicit procedural grounds for dismissal).

Court's Reasoning

The document contains no written reasoning; the court issued a per curiam dismissal without explanation. The court’s entry only records the dismissal and concurrence by three judges and preserves the ability for the parties to file authorized procedural motions under the appellate rules, indicating the dismissal may rest on procedural grounds rather than a merits determination.

Parties

Appellant
Da'vhon Young
Appellee
State of Florida
Judge
Tiffany Baker-Carper
Attorney
James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Attorney
Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General

Key Dates

Opinion date
2026-04-27

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing authorized appellate motion

    If you believe the dismissal was improper, evaluate whether a timely motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 is available and file it within the rule deadlines.

  2. 2

    Consult appellate counsel

    Discuss with an attorney experienced in Florida appellate practice to review the dismissal, available procedural remedies, and whether to seek rehearing or other relief.

  3. 3

    Monitor for entry of final disposition

    Track the case for any resolution of permitted motions; the dismissal is not final until those motions are resolved.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court dismissed the appeal; no written opinion explaining the reason was provided in this entry.
Who is affected by this decision?
Appellant Da’vhon Young and the State of Florida are the parties affected; the dismissal ends this appeal unless a permitted motion is filed.
What happens next?
The dismissal is not final until any timely authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 is resolved; the appellant may file such motions if applicable.
Can this be appealed further?
If the appellant believes the dismissal was in error, they may seek relief only through the authorized procedural motions mentioned or other appropriate post-judgment remedies; further appellate review would depend on preservation of issues and applicable rules.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2025-3354
                 _____________________________

DA'VHON YOUNG,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Tiffany Baker-Carper, Judge.


                         April 27, 2026

PER CURIAM.

    DISMISSED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.
                _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________


Da’vhon Young, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.




                           2