Maschelle Adrianne Pugh W v. Eric P. Pugh
Docket 4D2025-1603
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Family
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-1603
Appeal from a nonfinal order in a family-law case in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County
Summary
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a nonfinal order entered by the Martin County circuit court in a family-law appeal brought by Maschelle Adrianne Pugh. The opinion is short: the panel reviewed the nonfinal order and, without published opinion or extended discussion, affirmed the lower court's decision. The opinion notes the disposition is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved. The appellant appeared pro se; appellee was represented by counsel.
Issue Decided
- Whether the nonfinal order entered by the circuit court should be affirmed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a brief per curiam ruling affirming the circuit court's nonfinal order. The opinion does not elaborate on legal analysis or factual findings, instead announcing the result and noting that the mandate is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved. Because no further reasoning is provided, the affirmation stands as the court's disposition.
Parties
- Appellant
- Maschelle Adrianne Pugh
- Appellee
- Eric P. Pugh
- Judge
- Sherwood Bauer, Jr.
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, she should timely file a motion for rehearing in the district court to preserve the opportunity to revisit the decision.
- 2
Consult an attorney
The appellant should consult family-law counsel to evaluate the order, assess rehearing or further appellate options, and advise on consequences in the underlying circuit-court case.
- 3
Monitor rehearing deadline and comply with orders
Track the deadline for any motion for rehearing and continue to comply with the existing circuit-court orders while the appeal and any rehearing are pending.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The court affirmed the circuit court's nonfinal order in this family-law appeal.
- Does this decision end the case?
- No. The opinion states the disposition is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
- Who is affected by this ruling?
- The parties to the family-law action, Maschelle Adrianne Pugh (appellant) and Eric P. Pugh (appellee), are directly affected.
- Can this be appealed further?
- If a timely motion for rehearing is filed and denied, the parties may seek further review as permitted by Florida appellate procedure; the opinion itself does not discuss further appeal rights.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MASCHELLE ADRIANNE PUGH,
Appellant,
v.
ERIC P. PUGH,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1603
[April 23, 2026]
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case
No. 432024DR000315AXMX.
Maschelle Adrianne Pugh, Jupiter, pro se.
Scott D. Glassman of Law Office of Scott Glassman, P.A., West Palm
Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, CIKLIN and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.