Micaiah Lufcy v. Sarah Lufcy N/K/A Sarah Tolfa
Docket 5D2025-1361
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Family
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 5D2025-1361
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County in a family law case
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in a family law matter between Micaiah Lufcy (appellant) and Sarah Lufcy (n/k/a Tolfa) (appellee). The appeal arose from proceedings in the Seminole County Circuit Court, and the appellate court issued a short per curiam opinion simply stating 'AFFIRMED.' No additional reasoning or factual details are included in the published entry. The panel of judges Wallis, Edwards, and Maciver concurred, and the decision was issued April 21, 2026.
Issue Decided
- Whether the trial court's ruling in the underlying family law case should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance that provides no written explanation of the court's reasoning. By affirming, the appellate panel implicitly found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings or rulings, but the opinion does not state the legal standard or factual application that led to that conclusion.
Parties
- Appellant
- Micaiah Lufcy
- Appellee
- Sarah Lufcy (n/k/a Tolfa)
- Judge
- Susan Stacy
- Attorney
- Theodore F. Greene III
- Attorney
- Michael M. Brownlee
- Attorney
- Grace M. Zogaib
Key Dates
- Case decision date
- 2026-04-21
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Check for timely post-appeal motions
If a party seeks additional relief, consider filing a motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 within the applicable timeframes.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If there are grounds and strategic reasons to pursue further review, consult counsel promptly about seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court.
- 3
Comply with the underlying orders
Because the affirmation leaves the trial court's orders intact, the parties should ensure they are following any existing custody, support, or other family law obligations.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error in the trial court's ruling.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal, appellant Micaiah Lufcy and appellee Sarah Lufcy (n/k/a Tolfa), are directly affected; the underlying family law orders remain in force.
- Why doesn't the opinion explain the reasons?
- The court issued a short per curiam affirmance without written explanation, which is permitted and does not include the panel's detailed legal analysis.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- A further appeal to the Florida Supreme Court may be possible by petition for review, subject to that court's discretionary jurisdiction and filing deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-1361
L.T. Case No. 2014-DR-000836-02D-W
_____________________________
MICAIAH LUFCY,
Appellant,
v.
SARAH LUFCY (N/K/A TOLFA),
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.
Susan Stacy, Judge.
Theodore F. Greene III, of the Law Offices of Theodore F. Greene,
LC, Orlando, for Appellant.
Michael M. Brownlee and Grace M. Zogaib, of the Brownlee Law
Firm, Orlando, for Appellee.
April 21, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS, EDWARDS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
2