Keyon M. Paige v. State of Florida
Docket 5D2025-3183
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Habeas Corpus
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 5D2025-3183
Appeal from the denial of a Rule 3.800 postconviction motion in the Circuit Court for Duval County
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal reviewed a pro se appeal by Keyon M. Paige from an order of the Duval County Circuit Court in a 3.800 proceeding (postconviction relief). The appellate court issued a short per curiam decision on April 23, 2026, affirming the lower court's ruling. No written opinion or extended reasoning is provided in the document; the court simply stated AFFIRMED and noted concurrence by three judges and the possibility of filing certain post-decision motions under Florida appellate rules.
Issues Decided
- Whether the circuit court erred in denying Keyon M. Paige's Rule 3.800 postconviction/motion
- Whether any grounds raised in the pro se 3.800 filing warranted relief under Florida postconviction procedures
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is per curiam and contains no substantive explanation; the appellate court affirmed the circuit court's ruling without a written opinion. Because no reasoning is provided, the affirmance indicates the appellate panel found no reversible error in the lower court's resolution of the Rule 3.800 motion.
Parties
- Appellant
- Keyon M. Paige
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Mark Jeffrey Borello
- Judge
- Wallis
- Judge
- Soud
- Judge
- Maciver
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing post-opinion motions
If appropriate, file a timely motion for rehearing or rehearing en banc under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 to preserve further appellate review.
- 2
Consult counsel
Discuss with an attorney whether grounds exist for further appeal to the Florida Supreme Court (e.g., a petition for discretionary review) or other remedies.
- 3
Monitor deadlines
Ensure any post-decision or appellate deadlines are calendared and met, because the judgment is not final until allowable motions have been resolved.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of Mr. Paige's Rule 3.800 postconviction motion.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The decision affects appellant Keyon M. Paige and the State of Florida as the appellee; it leaves the circuit court's order denying relief in place.
- Does the opinion explain the reasons for affirmance?
- No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without providing substantive reasoning in this document.
- Can this decision be challenged further?
- Potentially, subject to Florida appellate rules; the opinion notes the case is not final until any timely and authorized motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 are resolved.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-3183
L.T. Case No. 2020-CF-002006-A
_____________________________
KEYON M. PAIGE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Mark Jeffrey Borello, Judge.
Keyon M. Paige, Madison, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
April 23, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS, SOUD, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
2