What did the court decide?

The court dismissed the petition for a writ of prohibition; it issued a short per curiam order and gave no written explanation.

Who is affected by this decision?

The petitioner, Antwaun Brown, and respondent United Parcel Service, Inc., are the named parties; the dismissal ends Brown’s original petition in the appellate court unless further relief is sought.

The decision is not final until the time for filing authorized post-decision motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 expires; Brown may pursue those motions if appropriate.

Can this dismissal be challenged?

Potentially, by timely filing an authorized motion under the cited rules or by pursuing other available appellate remedies, but specific options depend on the underlying circumstances and should be discussed with counsel.

Brown v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Docket 1D2026-1227

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherDismissed

Filed: May 1, 2026 · 5 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Other
Disposition: Dismissed
Docket: 1D2026-1227

Original petition for a writ of prohibition filed in the First District Court of Appeal

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal dismissed Antwaun Brown’s original petition for a writ of prohibition against United Parcel Service, Inc. The brief per curiam order provides no opinion or reasoning and simply records the dismissal and that the decision is not final until the time for certain post-decision motions has passed. The petitioner proceeded pro se and respondent did not appear. The court's action ends this original proceeding in the appellate court for now.

Issue Decided

Whether the petition for a writ of prohibition should be granted to prohibit an act by a lower tribunal or officer

Court's Reasoning

The order is a per curiam dismissal and contains no substantive explanation of the court's reasoning. Because the court simply dismissed the petition without opinion, there is no stated legal analysis or factual findings in the published document to explain the result.

Parties

Petitioner: Antwaun Brown
Respondent: United Parcel Service, Inc.

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-05-01

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing authorized post-decision motions
If there are grounds, the petitioner should evaluate filing motions under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 within the applicable time limits.
2
Consult an attorney
Because the order provides no reasoning, the petitioner should consult counsel to assess whether further appellate relief or other remedies are available and appropriate.
3
Monitor deadlines
Ensure any motion or further appeal is filed before the deadlines specified in the Florida appellate rules to preserve rights.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The court dismissed the petition for a writ of prohibition; it issued a short per curiam order and gave no written explanation.
Who is affected by this decision?: The petitioner, Antwaun Brown, and respondent United Parcel Service, Inc., are the named parties; the dismissal ends Brown’s original petition in the appellate court unless further relief is sought.
What happens next?: The decision is not final until the time for filing authorized post-decision motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 expires; Brown may pursue those motions if appropriate.
Can this dismissal be challenged?: Potentially, by timely filing an authorized motion under the cited rules or by pursuing other available appellate remedies, but specific options depend on the underlying circumstances and should be discussed with counsel.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                         No. 1D2026-1227
                  _____________________________

ANTWAUN BROWN,

    Petitioner,

    v.

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

    Respondent.
                  _____________________________


Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Proceedings.


                          May 1, 2026


PER CURIAM.

    DISMISSED.

ROWE, M.K. THOMAS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
              _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________


Antwaun Brown, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.




                                2