Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Hall v. Solaris Healthcare Lake City, LLC, and Premier Group Insurance

Docket 1D2025-0341

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

OtherAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Case type
Other
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
1D2025-0341

Appeal from the Office of Judges of Compensation Claims

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Sheila Hall from a decision of the Office of Judges of Compensation Claims concerning a workplace injury dated December 12, 2023. The panel issued a unanimous per curiam opinion on April 24, 2026, and affirmed the lower tribunal's ruling. The opinion is brief, provides no extended explanation in the published text, and notes that the judgment is subject to any timely post-judgment motions under Florida appellate rules.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the decision of the Office of Judges of Compensation Claims concerning Sheila Hall should be reversed.

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmation without an opinion in the published text, indicating the appellate panel found no reversible error in the lower tribunal's decision. Because the opinion contains no stated legal analysis or factual findings in the published entry, specific legal reasoning is not provided in the document.

Parties

Appellant
Sheila Hall
Appellee
Solaris Healthcare Lake City, LLC
Appellee
Premier Group Insurance
Judge
Ralph J. Humphries
Attorney
Bradley M. Sopotnick
Attorney
William H. Rogner

Key Dates

Date of Accident
2023-12-12
Decision Date
2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider post-judgment motions

    If there are grounds, the appellant should consult counsel about timely filing authorized motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

  2. 2

    Evaluate further appeal options

    Discuss with an attorney whether seeking discretionary review or other relief is appropriate and timely under Florida law.

  3. 3

    Comply with underlying order

    Unless further relief is sought and obtained, parties should comply with the judgment and any orders from the Office of Judges of Compensation Claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court affirmed the lower tribunal's decision; the written entry is a short per curiam affirmation without detailed explanation.
Who is affected by this decision?
The decision affects appellant Sheila Hall and the appellees Solaris Healthcare Lake City, LLC and Premier Group Insurance, as it leaves the lower tribunal's ruling in place.
What happens next?
Parties may file any timely and authorized post-judgment motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331; further appeal options are limited and should be evaluated with counsel.
Does this opinion explain the court's reasoning?
No; the per curiam entry contains no substantive reasoning or citation of authorities in the published text.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2025-0341
                 _____________________________

SHEILA HALL,

    Appellant,

    v.

SOLARIS HEALTHCARE LAKE
CITY, LLC and PREMIER GROUP
INSURANCE,

    Appellees.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims.
Ralph J. Humphries, Judge.

Date of Accident: December 12, 2023.

                        April 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.
               _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Bradley M. Sopotnick of Morgan and Morgan Jacksonville PLLC,
Jacksonville, for Appellant.
William H. Rogner of HR Law, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.




                               2