Lifsey v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Victory Lofts at Channelside Condominium Association, Inc.
Docket 2D2025-3202
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Other
- Disposition
- Dismissed
- Docket
- 2D2025-3202
Petition for writ of certiorari to review a circuit court proceeding in Hillsborough County
Summary
The Second District Court of Appeal dismissed J. Stanford Lifsey’s petition for writ of certiorari as moot. The court concluded that changed circumstances meant it could not provide any effective relief, citing precedent that moot appeals must be dismissed. The petition had sought review of a circuit court decision, but because subsequent events eliminated the possibility of judicial relief, the appeal was terminated without reaching the merits.
Issue Decided
- Whether the petition for writ of certiorari remained justiciable or was moot in light of changed circumstances
Court's Reasoning
The court relied on the principle that an appeal is moot when changes in circumstances before decision make it impossible for the court to grant effectual relief. Because the circumstances had changed such that no meaningful relief could be provided, dismissal was required. The court cited controlling precedent that moot cases should be dismissed rather than decided on the merits.
Authorities Cited
- State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Bellamy302 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)
- Godwin v. State593 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1992)
- Montgomery v. Department of Health & Rehabilitation Services468 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
Parties
- Petitioner
- J. Stanford Lifsey
- Respondent
- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
- Respondent
- Victory Lofts at Channelside Condominium Association, Inc.
- Judge
- Paul Huey
Key Dates
- Opinion date
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult counsel about current status
The petitioner should consult an attorney to determine whether any factual or procedural developments might restore a live controversy or provide other avenues for relief.
- 2
Consider whether new proceedings are appropriate
If circumstances change or a related claim exists, the petitioner may consider filing a new petition or motion in the appropriate court to seek relief tied to current facts.
- 3
Monitor for official opinion publication
Because the opinion is subject to revision prior to official publication, parties should check for any corrected or published opinion that might affect procedural options.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does 'dismissed as moot' mean?
- It means the court found that changes after the case was filed removed any practical way for the court to grant relief, so the court ended the case without addressing the underlying legal issues.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The petitioner, J. Stanford Lifsey, is directly affected because his petition was dismissed; the named respondents are not required to obtain further relief from this court on the petition.
- Does the court's dismissal decide the underlying legal claims?
- No. The court did not reach or rule on the merits of the underlying legal claims because it concluded that it could not provide effective relief.
- Can this dismissal be appealed?
- Typically a dismissal as moot is a final appellate disposition; further review would depend on whether a higher court has jurisdiction and whether any new justiciable issue arises.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
J. STANFORD LIFSEY,
Petitioner,
v.
SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP and VICTORY
LOFTS AT CHANNELSIDE CONDOMINUM
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Respondents.
No. 2D2025-3202
April 29, 2026
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough
County; Paul Huey, Judge.
J. Stanford Lifsey, pro se.
Duane A. Daiker of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Tampa, for
Respondent Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP.
No appearance for Respondent Victory Lofts at Channelside
Condominium Association, Inc.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed as moot. See State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Bellamy, 302
So. 3d 1081, 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) ("On appeal, a case is moot
where, by a change of circumstances prior to the appellate court's
decision, the judiciary is unable to grant any effectual relief." (first citing
Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1992); and then citing
Montgomery v. Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs., 468 So. 2d 1014, 1016
(Fla. 1st DCA 1985))); see also Godwin, 593 So. 2d at 212 ("A moot case
generally will be dismissed.").
LUCAS, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2