Shirley v. Shirley
Docket 2D2025-2697
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Other
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-2697
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Sarasota County under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130
Summary
The Second District Court of Appeal reviewed a pro se appeal by Monika Margarethe Shirley from an order of the Sarasota County Circuit Court. The appellate court, in a brief per curiam decision, affirmed the lower court's ruling. No written opinion explaining the court's reasoning was published beyond the single-word disposition, and no appellee participated in the appeal. The panel of judges Silberman, Morris, and Black concurred in the affirmance.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's order challenged by Monika Margarethe Shirley warranted reversal on appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a published opinion, indicating it found no reversible error in the circuit court's ruling. The absence of an appellee brief and the concise disposition suggest the appellate panel concluded the lower court's decision comported with controlling law or was not properly contested. Because no further explanation was provided, the court's reasoning is limited to its determination that affirmation was appropriate.
Parties
- Appellant
- Monika Margarethe Shirley
- Appellee
- Wayne R. Shirley
- Judge
- Maria Ruhl
- Judge
- Silberman
- Judge
- Morris
- Judge
- Black
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-17
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Review the circuit court order and record
The appellant should obtain and review the circuit court's order and the full record to determine the grounds for potential further review or clarify the issues affirmed on appeal.
- 2
Consider seeking discretionary review
If there are substantial questions of law or conflict with other decisions, the appellant may consult counsel about filing a petition for review with the Florida Supreme Court within the applicable deadline.
- 3
Comply with the lower court's order
Until and unless reversed, parties should comply with the terms of the circuit court's order to avoid contempt or other enforcement actions.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appellate court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's order, meaning it found no basis to reverse the trial court's decision.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal, Monika Margarethe Shirley (appellant) and Wayne R. Shirley (appellee), are directly affected; the lower court's order remains in effect.
- Why is there no detailed opinion explaining the decision?
- The court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a published opinion, which indicates the panel deemed explanation unnecessary, often because no reversible error was shown.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- A party may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, but further review is discretionary and typically requires filing a notice or petition meeting state rules and deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
MONIKA MARGARETHE SHIRLEY,
Appellant,
v.
WAYNE R. SHIRLEY,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-2697
April 17, 2026
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for
Sarasota County; Maria Ruhl, Judge.
Monika Margarethe Shirley, pro se.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.