Antonio Alacena v. Godly Jack
Docket A26D0448
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Georgia
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Denied
- Docket
- A26D0448
Application for discretionary appeal to the Georgia Court of Appeals following a lower-court proceeding (LC# 25CV017130).
Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals considered an application for discretionary appeal filed by Antonio Alacena in case A26D0448 (LC# 25CV017130) and denied the application on May 4, 2026. The order is a short administrative disposition: the court refused to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction and therefore did not grant review of the underlying trial-court matter. No substantive legal reasoning or discussion of the merits appears in the document; it is a formal minutes entry certifying the denial.
Issue Decided
- Whether the Court of Appeals should grant discretionary review of the underlying case identified by LC# 25CV017130.
Court's Reasoning
The document is a short minute entry that does not state the court's detailed reasons for its decision. The practical effect is that the court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction; such denials typically reflect that the court found no need to review the matter under its discretionary standards, though no specific rule or analysis is provided in this order.
Parties
- Appellant
- Antonio Alacena
- Appellee
- Godly Jack
- Judge
- Clerk, Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-05-04
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
Discuss whether any further appellate options remain (for example, rehearing, review by the Georgia Supreme Court, or other extraordinary relief) and evaluate deadlines.
- 2
Confirm status of lower-court proceedings
Ensure the lower-court judgment or order is final and determine whether any post-judgment motions or enforcement actions are required or available.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The Court of Appeals denied Antonio Alacena's application for discretionary appeal on May 4, 2026, so it will not review the lower-court decision.
- Does this decision explain the court's reasons?
- No; the order is a brief minutes entry that does not provide substantive legal reasoning or explanation for the denial.
- Who is affected by this order?
- The parties in the underlying case, Antonio Alacena and Godly Jack, are affected because the appellate court declined to review the lower-court ruling.
- What happens next?
- Unless another appellate remedy is available, the lower-court judgment remains in effect; the appellant may consider any remaining procedural options such as filing in a higher court if permitted.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 04, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order
A26D0448. ANTONIO ALACENA v. GODLY JACK.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be
hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS:
25CV017130
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 04, 2026.
I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes
of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto
affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.