What did the Court of Appeals decide?

The court denied Catherine Corkren's Application for Discretionary Appeal, meaning it will not review the lower-court matter through this discretionary mechanism.

Does this resolve the underlying case?

No. This order only denies discretionary appellate review; the underlying trial-court judgment or proceedings in LC No. 19CV0611 remain as previously decided unless other relief is sought.

Can this denial be appealed further?

Typically, a denial of a discretionary application by the Court of Appeals is final in that procedural posture; further review options are very limited and would generally require extraordinary intervention such as a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which is rarely granted.

Catherine Corkren v. City of Hoschton, Georgia

Docket A26D0426

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilDenied

Filed: Apr 15, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Denied
Docket: A26D0426

Application for discretionary appeal to the Court of Appeals from case LC No. 19CV0611

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals considered an Application for Discretionary Appeal filed by Catherine Corkren in case A26D0426 concerning LC No. 19CV0611. After review, the court issued a short administrative order denying the application. The document contains no substantive opinion explaining the court's reasoning beyond the single-word disposition denying the request for discretionary review.

Issue Decided

Whether the Court of Appeals should grant discretionary review of the underlying trial-court matter in LC No. 19CV0611

Court's Reasoning

The published document is a brief administrative order that denies the application without explanation. Because the order contains no substantive discussion of legal principles or factual application, the court's reasoning beyond denial is not stated in the document.

Parties

Appellant: Catherine Corkren
Appellee: City of Hoschton, Georgia

Key Dates

Court order date: 2026-04-15

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
Talk to an attorney experienced in Georgia appellate practice to confirm whether any further review options exist and to evaluate the status of the underlying case.
2
Review trial-court record and rulings
Ensure you understand the current posture and any outstanding deadlines in LC No. 19CV0611, including motions or post-judgment remedies at the trial level.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Court of Appeals decide?: The court denied Catherine Corkren's Application for Discretionary Appeal, meaning it will not review the lower-court matter through this discretionary mechanism.
Does this resolve the underlying case?: No. This order only denies discretionary appellate review; the underlying trial-court judgment or proceedings in LC No. 19CV0611 remain as previously decided unless other relief is sought.
Can this denial be appealed further?: Typically, a denial of a discretionary application by the Court of Appeals is final in that procedural posture; further review options are very limited and would generally require extraordinary intervention such as a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which is rarely granted.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                                              ATLANTA, April 15, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A26D0426. CATHERINE CORKREN v. CITY OF HOSCHTON, GEORGIA et al.


     Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.


LC NUMBERS:

19CV0611




                                      Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                           Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 15, 2026.

                                           I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes
                                      of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

                                           Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto
                                      affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                         , Clerk.