What did the Court of Appeals decide?

The court denied the request to hear an interlocutory appeal, meaning it will not take up the appeal at this stage.

Who is affected by this order?

The parties to the case—applicant Farion Hunter and appellee Dara Springston and others—are affected because the trial proceedings will continue without immediate review by the Court of Appeals.

What happens next in the case?

Proceedings in the trial court (LC No. 24SV094) will continue; any challenge to the trial court's rulings may need to wait for a final appealable judgment or another appropriate procedural vehicle.

Can this denial be appealed?

This order itself is the Court of Appeals' ruling on the interlocutory application; options are limited and would typically include seeking review only if another appellate remedy is available or if circumstances change to justify interlocutory review.

Farion Hunter v. Dara Springston

Docket A26I0189

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilDenied

Filed: May 4, 2026 · 2 days ago
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Denied
Docket: A26I0189

Application for interlocutory appeal to the Court of Appeals from a trial-court matter (LC No. 24SV094).

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals considered an application for an interlocutory appeal filed in case A26I0189 (LC No. 24SV094) and denied the application on May 4, 2026. The order is brief and procedural: the court declined to allow an immediate appeal from an interlocutory order, leaving the underlying trial-court proceedings to continue in the trial court. No substantive discussion of the merits or legal reasoning is included in the order.

Issue Decided

Whether the Court of Appeals should grant permission to hear an interlocutory appeal in case A26I0189 (LC No. 24SV094).

Court's Reasoning

The order is a short procedural disposition that denies the application; the court did not state legal reasoning or cite authorities in the published extract. Because the court denied the interlocutory application, it implicitly concluded that the criteria for immediate appellate review were not met or that review should await a final judgment, but no factual or legal explanation is provided in the order.

Parties

Appellant: Farion Hunter
Appellee: Dara Springston et al.
Judge: Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Key Dates

Court order date: 2026-05-04

What You Should Do Next

1
Continue trial-court proceedings
Follow the scheduling and rulings in the trial court (LC No. 24SV094) and comply with any existing orders or deadlines there.
2
Consult appellate counsel
Discuss whether there are alternative appellate options, such as waiting for a final judgment, seeking certification from the trial court, or identifying an emergency remedy if circumstances warrant.
3
Preserve issues for appeal
Ensure the record is developed and that objections and motions are preserved in the trial court so issues can be raised on a future appeal if appropriate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Court of Appeals decide?: The court denied the request to hear an interlocutory appeal, meaning it will not take up the appeal at this stage.
Who is affected by this order?: The parties to the case—applicant Farion Hunter and appellee Dara Springston and others—are affected because the trial proceedings will continue without immediate review by the Court of Appeals.
What happens next in the case?: Proceedings in the trial court (LC No. 24SV094) will continue; any challenge to the trial court's rulings may need to wait for a final appealable judgment or another appropriate procedural vehicle.
Can this denial be appealed?: This order itself is the Court of Appeals' ruling on the interlocutory application; options are limited and would typically include seeking review only if another appellate remedy is available or if circumstances change to justify interlocutory review.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                                              ATLANTA, May 04, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A26I0189. FARION HUNTER v. DARA SPRINGSTON et al.


     Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.


LC NUMBERS:

24SV094




                                      Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                           Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 04, 2026.

                                           I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes
                                      of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

                                           Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto
                                      affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                         , Clerk.