What did the court decide?

The Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal, meaning it refused to hear the case.

Does this resolve the underlying dispute between the parties?

No. The denial is procedural and does not decide the merits; the lower court's ruling remains in effect unless altered by another action.

Who is affected by this decision?

The immediate effect falls on the applicant, Xiaodong Guan, because his request for the Court of Appeals to review the case was denied; the appellee, Sueling Wang, retains the benefit of the existing lower-court position.

Can the applicant seek further review?

Possibly. Depending on rules and timelines, the applicant might seek reconsideration, move for discretionary review in a higher court if available, or pursue other post-judgment remedies in the trial court; they should consult counsel about specific options.

Xiaodong Guan v. Sueling Wang

Docket A26D0412

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilDenied

Filed: Apr 10, 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Denied
Docket: A26D0412

Application for discretionary appeal to the Court of Appeals from a civil case (LC No. 25CV000342).

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals considered an application for discretionary appeal by Xiaodong Guan from a civil action (LC No. 25CV000342) and denied the application on April 10, 2026. The order is brief and purely procedural: the court exercised its discretion and declined to grant review, so no merits decision on the underlying dispute between the named parties was made. The denial leaves the lower court's judgment or order intact and concludes this court's involvement unless the applicant pursues another available remedy.

Issue Decided

Whether the Court of Appeals should grant discretionary review of the underlying civil matter.

Court's Reasoning

The document is an administrative order denying discretionary review and does not state the court's reasoning on the merits. The court exercised its discretionary authority to decline the application, which is a routine docket-management decision rather than a decision resolving substantive legal issues.

Parties

Appellant: Xiaodong Guan
Appellee: Sueling Wang

Key Dates

Court order date: 2026-04-10

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
Affected parties should consult an attorney to identify remaining options, such as a motion for reconsideration, seeking review in a higher tribunal if permitted, or pursuing available trial-court remedies.
2
Confirm status of lower-court judgment
Verify the precise effect of this denial on the lower-court judgment or orders and determine any deadlines to act in the trial court (for enforcement, post-judgment motions, or alternative relief).
3
Consider filing motions in trial court
If relief is still available at the trial level (e.g., motions to alter or vacate judgment), the party should assess and, if appropriate, timely file those motions under governing procedural rules.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The Court of Appeals denied the application for discretionary appeal, meaning it refused to hear the case.
Does this resolve the underlying dispute between the parties?: No. The denial is procedural and does not decide the merits; the lower court's ruling remains in effect unless altered by another action.
Who is affected by this decision?: The immediate effect falls on the applicant, Xiaodong Guan, because his request for the Court of Appeals to review the case was denied; the appellee, Sueling Wang, retains the benefit of the existing lower-court position.
Can the applicant seek further review?: Possibly. Depending on rules and timelines, the applicant might seek reconsideration, move for discretionary review in a higher court if available, or pursue other post-judgment remedies in the trial court; they should consult counsel about specific options.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                                              ATLANTA, April 10, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A26D0412. XIAODONG GUAN v. SUELING WANG.


     Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.


LC NUMBERS:

25CV000342




                                      Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                           Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 10, 2026.

                                           I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes
                                      of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

                                           Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto
                                      affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                         , Clerk.