What did the Court of Appeals decide?

The court denied the application for discretionary appeal, meaning it will not review the lower court's decision.

Does this decide the original family case's merits?

No. This order only denies permission to appeal and does not address the substantive issues decided by the trial court.

Who is affected by this order?

The parties to the underlying family case, Stephen Arthur Vance (applicant) and Cassie Lynn Vance (respondent), are directly affected because the case will not proceed to the Court of Appeals.

Can the denial be challenged?

Options are limited: the applicant may seek reconsideration in the Court of Appeals if permitted, or pursue other available relief in the trial court if appropriate; further appeal is generally not available from a denial of discretionary review.

Stephen Arthur Vance v. Cassie Lynn Vance

Docket A26D0416

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

FamilyDenied

Filed: Apr 13, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Type: Opinion
Case type: Family
Disposition: Denied
Docket: A26D0416

Application for discretionary appeal to the Court of Appeals from a lower-court family matter (LC No. 24V0055).

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals considered an application for discretionary appeal filed by Stephen Arthur Vance from a domestic-relations case (LC No. 24V0055). After review, the court denied the application for discretionary appeal on April 13, 2026. The order is a short procedural ruling and does not address the merits of the underlying dispute; it simply declines to grant permission for the case to proceed to the Court of Appeals for full appellate review.

Issue Decided

Whether the Court of Appeals should grant discretionary review of the lower court's decision in the underlying family case.

Court's Reasoning

The document is a brief administrative order denying the application for discretionary appeal and does not state the court's detailed reasoning. By denying the application, the court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to review the lower court's decision. The order does not address or resolve the substantive legal issues from the trial court record.

Parties

Appellant: Stephen Arthur Vance
Appellee: Cassie Lynn Vance

Key Dates

Court order date: 2026-04-13

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult your attorney about options
Discuss with counsel whether a motion for reconsideration is appropriate or whether further relief can be sought in the trial court based on the underlying judgment.
2
Review trial-court judgment and record
If relief in the trial court is possible (e.g., motion for new trial, modification, or enforcement matters), prepare and file the necessary motions within applicable deadlines.
3
Confirm deadlines
Ask your attorney to confirm any remaining deadlines for post-judgment motions or other procedural steps in the trial court to preserve rights.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Court of Appeals decide?: The court denied the application for discretionary appeal, meaning it will not review the lower court's decision.
Does this decide the original family case's merits?: No. This order only denies permission to appeal and does not address the substantive issues decided by the trial court.
Who is affected by this order?: The parties to the underlying family case, Stephen Arthur Vance (applicant) and Cassie Lynn Vance (respondent), are directly affected because the case will not proceed to the Court of Appeals.
Can the denial be challenged?: Options are limited: the applicant may seek reconsideration in the Court of Appeals if permitted, or pursue other available relief in the trial court if appropriate; further appeal is generally not available from a denial of discretionary review.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                                              ATLANTA, April 13, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A26D0416. STEPHEN ARTHUR VANCE v. CASSIE LYNN VANCE.


     Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.


LC NUMBERS:

24V0055




                                      Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                           Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 13, 2026.

                                           I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes
                                      of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

                                           Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto
                                      affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                         , Clerk.