Christopher Fontes v. Quencia Bloom
Docket A26E0180
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Georgia
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Denied
- Docket
- A26E0180
Appellate motion decision: ruling on an appellant's motion filed under Court of Appeals Rule 40(b).
Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals issued a short order denying the appellant's motion made under Court of Appeals Rule 40(b) in case A26E0180, Fontes v. Bloom. The order contains no extended explanation or factual findings — it simply states the motion is denied and is certified as an official extract of the court minutes. There is no discussion of the grounds for denial or any further relief granted.
Issue Decided
- Whether the appellant's Rule 40(b) motion should be granted.
Court's Reasoning
The order does not state the court's reasoning or legal analysis. It records the disposition only — that the Rule 40(b) motion is denied — without citing legal grounds or factual findings.
Parties
- Appellant
- Fontes
- Appellee
- Bloom
- Court
- Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
- Judge
- Clerk (certifying official)
Key Dates
- Court order date
- 2026-04-15
- Clerk certification date
- 2026-04-15
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
Discuss with your lawyer whether the denial can be challenged or whether other appellate filings or remedies remain available given the underlying case posture.
- 2
Review the motion record
Obtain and review the full motion file and any related docket entries to understand why the motion may have been denied and to identify potential grounds for further action.
- 3
Monitor deadlines
Confirm any applicable deadlines for post-decision filings (rehearing, reconsideration, or further appeals) and act promptly to preserve rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The Court of Appeals denied the appellant's motion filed under Rule 40(b).
- Who is affected by this order?
- The appellant (Fontes) and the opposing party (Bloom) are affected; the appellant's requested relief under that motion was refused.
- Does the order explain why the motion was denied?
- No. The order contains no explanation or reasoning for the denial; it only states the disposition.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Possibly, depending on the nature of the motion and the underlying case, the appellant may seek further review, but this short order does not specify available remedies or deadlines—consult counsel promptly for options.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
April 15, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26E0180. FONTES v. BLOOM.
Appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 40(b) in the above-
styled case is hereby DENIED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
04/15/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.