State v. Jones
Docket 2026-A-0016
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Court
- Ohio Court of Appeals
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Dismissed
- Judge
- Patton
- Citation
- State v. Jones, 2026-Ohio-1447
- Docket
- 2026-A-0016
Appeal from a trial court order denying motions to dismiss a death-penalty specification in a criminal case
Summary
The Court of Appeals dismissed Odraye G. Jones’s pro se appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Jones had appealed a March 13, 2026 trial-court entry denying his motions to dismiss a death-penalty specification. The appellate court held the denial was an interlocutory order that did not qualify as a final, appealable order under Ohio law and R.C. 2505.02(B), so it could not be reviewed now. Because no final judgment disposed of all claims, the appeal was dismissed and pending motions were overruled as moot.
Issues Decided
- Whether the trial court's denial of motions to dismiss a death-penalty specification is a final, appealable order
- Whether the appellate court has jurisdiction to review an interlocutory ruling that does not dispose of the case or fit within R.C. 2505.02(B)
Court's Reasoning
Under Ohio law only final orders, as defined in R.C. 2505.02(B), are immediately appealable. The court concluded the March 13, 2026 denial of the motions to dismiss the death-penalty specification was interlocutory because it did not dispose of all claims or affect a substantial right in a way that foreclosed appropriate relief on later appeal. Because the entry did not fall into any statutory category of final order, the appellate court lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal.
Authorities Cited
- R.C. 2505.02(B)
- Noble v. Colwell44 Ohio St.3d 92 (1989)
- State v. Mitchell2017-Ohio-94 (8th Dist.)
Parties
- Appellant
- Odraye G. Jones a.k.a. Malik Allah-U-Akbar
- Appellee
- State of Ohio
- Judge
- Robert J. Patton
- Judge
- Matt Lynch, P.J.
- Judge
- Eugene A. Lucci, J.
- Attorney
- Kara Keating (Special Prosecutor)
- Attorney
- Daniel Kasaris (Special Prosecutor)
- Attorney
- Erik Spitzer (Special Prosecutor)
Key Dates
- Motion to Dismiss filed
- 2026-02-12
- Supplemental Motion filed
- 2026-03-03
- Trial court entry denying motions
- 2026-03-13
- Notice of appeal filed
- 2026-04-06
- State moved to strike notice of appeal
- 2026-04-09
- Appellate decision dismissing appeal
- 2026-04-22
- Resentencing jury empanelment scheduled
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Proceed with trial-court proceedings
Jones or his counsel should prepare for the resentencing jury empanelment and other trial-court matters scheduled on April 23, 2026.
- 2
Consider preserving issues for later appeal
Defense counsel should ensure objections and relevant motions are on the record to preserve issues for a future appeal after a final judgment is entered.
- 3
Consult appellate counsel about timing
If Jones wants to challenge rulings on appeal, he should consult appellate counsel to determine the appropriate timing and grounds for a future appeal once a final order exists.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The court dismissed the appeal because the trial-court ruling Jones appealed was not a final order that the appellate court could review.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- Jones is affected because his attempt to appeal the denial of his motions to dismiss the death-penalty specification cannot proceed now; the state and the trial court are also affected because proceedings at the trial level continue.
- What happens next in the trial court?
- The criminal case proceeds in the trial court, including the scheduled resentencing proceedings; the appellate court overruled pending motions as moot.
- Can Jones appeal again?
- Jones may appeal a final judgment once the trial court enters a final, appealable order, but an immediate appeal of this interlocutory ruling is not permitted under Ohio law.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2026-Ohio-1447.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
ASHTABULA COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2026-A-0016
Plaintiff-Appellee,
Criminal Appeal from the
- vs - Court of Common Pleas
ODRAYE G. JONES a.k.a.
MALIK ALLAH-U-AKBAR, Trial Court No. 1997 CR 00221
Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
Decided: April 22, 2026
Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik Spitzer,
Special Prosecutors, 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215 (For Plaintiff-
Appellee).
Odraye G. Jones, pro se, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH
44047 (Defendant-Appellant).
ROBERT J. PATTON, J.
{¶1} Appellant, Odraye G. Jones (“Jones”), filed the instant pro se appeal on April
6, 2026. Jones seeks to appeal from a March 13, 2026 judgment entry denying Jones’s
February 12, 2026 Motion to Dismiss Second Specification and his Supplemental Motion
to Dismiss Second Specification filed on March 3, 2026. On April 9, 2026, appellee, the
State of Ohio (“State”), filed a motion to strike the notice of appeal. Neither Jones nor his
trial counsel filed a response in opposition to the State’s motion.
{¶2} Subsequently, on April 21, 2026, the State filed a motion for emergency stay
of trial court proceedings while this appeal is pending. We note that the Ashtabula County
Court of Common Pleas is scheduled to empanel a jury for the resentencing phase in the
underlying case on April 23, 2026, where Jones is represented by counsel.
{¶3} Upon review of the notice of appeal and the judgment entry at issue, we
conclude, sua sponte, that this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
{¶4} Since this court may only entertain those appeals from final judgments, we
must determine whether there is a final appealable order. Noble v. Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d
92, 96 (1989). A trial court’s judgment can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court
only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Ohio Const., art. IV, § 3(B)(2); Radic v.
Sternadel, 2025-Ohio-4527, ¶ 2 (11th Dist.). If a lower court’s judgment is not final, then
this court does not have jurisdiction to review the case, and the case must be dismissed.
Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989).
{¶5} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth nine categories of
appealable judgments, and if a trial court’s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be
deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. In this case, the
April 2, 2026 judgment entry being appealed does not fit within any of the categories for
being a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all claims.
{¶6} The March 13, 2026 entry does not constitute a final order under R.C.
2505.02(B). A ruling denying a motion to dismiss the indictment including specifications
within the indictment is an interlocutory order that does not constitute a final, appealable
order. State v. Mitchell, 2017-Ohio-94, ¶ 11 (8th Dist.); State v. Crawley, 96 Ohio App.3d
149, 155 (12th Dist. 1994), citing State v. Hawkins, 30 Ohio App.3d 259, 260 (8th Dist.
1986).
{¶7} Here, the trial court denied Jones’s request to dismiss the death penalty
specifications of the indictment. Such ruling is interlocutory and does not determine the
PAGE 2 OF 4
Case No. 2026-A-0016
action, prevent a judgment, or affect a substantial right in a manner that would foreclose
appropriate relief in a subsequent appeal. As the challenged entry neither disposes of the
case nor fits within any statutory category of a final, appealable order, it remains an
interlocutory ruling over which this court lacks jurisdiction. In the absence of a final order,
the appeal must be dismissed.
{¶8} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Furthermore, all
pending motions are overruled as moot.
MATT LYNCH, P.J.,
EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,
concur.
PAGE 3 OF 4
Case No. 2026-A-0016
JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that
the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are overruled
as moot.
Costs to be taxed against Appellant.
The Clerk of Courts is hereby instructed to serve a copy of this entry to the following:
1. Appellant, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson St. Jefferson, Ohio
44047;
2. Trial counsel, Attorney Donald J. Malarcik, 121 S. Main St., Suite
520, Akron, OH 44308 and The Ashtabula County Public Defender’s
Office, 22 East Jefferson St., Jefferson, OH 44047;
3. The Ashtabula County Prosecutor’s Office, 25 W. Jefferson St.,
Jefferson, Ohio 44047;
4. Special Prosecutors, Attys. Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik
Spitzer, 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215; and
5. Judge David A. Schroeder, Chambers.
JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON
PRESIDING JUDGE MATT LYNCH,
concurs
JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI,
concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate
pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
PAGE 4 OF 4
Case No. 2026-A-0016